Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Daniel L Stufflebeam

Biographic Data

ID205116
NAMEDaniel L Stufflebeam
GIVEN NAMESDaniel L
FAMILY NAMEStufflebeam
SIGNATURESTUFFLEBEAM D L
AFFILIATIONSWestern Michigan University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS22
TOTAL CITATIONS39
WORKS AS AUTHOR22
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1963
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2008
H-INDEX4
  • A Tribute to Egon Guba

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam, Daniel Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2008

  • Egon Guba's Conceptual Journey to Constructivist Evaluation

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Qualitative Inquiry•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 1

  • A Self-Assessment Procedure for Use in Evaluation Training

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam, Lori A Wingate•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2005•Cited by: 1

    This article describes the Self-Assessment of Program Evaluation Expertise instrument and procedure developed to help participants assess their learning gains in a 3-week evaluation institute. Participants completed the instrument in a pre- and posttest format. To reduce both the threat of embarrassment from individual results and the temptation to inflate self-ratings, participants responded anonymously. Although each participant saw her or his …

  • A Note on the Purposes, Development, and Applicability of the Joint Committee Evaluation Standards

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2004•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • Interdisciplinary Ph.D. Programming in Evaluation

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2001•Cited by: 5

  • Evaluation Checklists

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2001•Cited by: 3•References: 1

    This article describes a project designed to provide evaluators, their clients, and other stake-holders with checklists for guiding and assessing formative and summative evaluations. The checklists pertain to program, personnel, and product evaluations, and reflect different conceptualizations of evaluation. They are constructed for use in planning, contracting, conducting, reporting, and judging evaluations. The checklists, along with papers on …

  • The Metaevaluation Imperative

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2001•Cited by: 15•References: 1

    The evaluation field has advanced sufficiently in its methodology and public service that evaluators can and should subject their evaluations to systematic metaevaluation. Metaevaluation is the process of delineating, obtaining, and applying descriptive information and judgmental information about an evaluation’s utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy and its systematic nature, competence, integrity/honesty, respectfulness, and social resp…

  • Lessons in Contracting for Evaluations

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2000•Cited by: 6

    A 1995 evaluation of the U.S. Marine Corps’ personnel evaluation system and a 1991 evaluation of the National Assessment Governing Board procedure for setting cut scores on the mathematics section of the National Assessment of Educational Progress provided valuable lessons in how to minimize the risks of misunderstanding what an evaluation will involve, subversion of the evaluation, controversy, and animosity. Both evaluations were nationally sig…

  • Using professional standards to legally and ethically release evaluation findings

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1999

  • Evaluation of superintendent performance

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1995

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1994

  • Principal evaluation

    Daniel L Stufflebeam, Daniel Stufflebeam et al.•ARTICLE•Peabody Journal of Education•1991•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    (1991). Principal evaluation: New directions for improvement. Peabody Journal of Education: Vol. 68, New Ways to Assess the Performance of School Principals, Part II, pp. 24-46

  • The Complete Educator

    William W Cooley, George F Madaus et al.•ARTICLE•Educational Researcher•1990

  • Coping with the point of entry problem in evaluating projects

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1985

  • Educational Evaluation and Accountability

    Open Access•George F Madaus, Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Behavioral Scientist•1984•References: 11

  • Reflections on the movement to promote effective educational evaluations through the use of professional standards

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1983

  • The project to develop standards for educational evaluation

    Open Access•Jeri M Ridings, Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1981

  • The availability and importance of evaluative information within the school

    Open Access•David Nevo, Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1976

  • Encyclopedia of Educational Evaluation

    Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•The Journal of Higher Education•1976•Cited by: 2

  • Estimating Test Norms from Variable Size Item and Examinee Samples

    Open Access•Desmond L Cook, Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Educational and Psychological…•1967

  • A depth study of the evaluation requirement

    Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Theory Into Practice•1966•Cited by: 4•References: 3

    1966). A depth study of the evaluation requirement. Theory Into Practice: Vol. 5, Title 1, pp. 121-133

  • TIP on books

    Daniel L Stufflebeam, Desmond L Cook et al.•ARTICLE•Theory Into Practice•1963

    Findley, Warren G., editor. The Impact and Improvement of School Testing Programs. Sixty‐second Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963. xii + 304 pp. $4.50. Goslin, David A. The Search for Ability: Standardised Testing in Social Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1963. 204 pp. $4.00. Hoffmann, Banesh. The Tyranny of Testing. New York: Crowell‐Collier Press, 1962. 223 pp…

  • The Metaevaluation Imperative

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2001•Cited by: 15•References: 1

    The evaluation field has advanced sufficiently in its methodology and public service that evaluators can and should subject their evaluations to systematic metaevaluation. Metaevaluation is the process of delineating, obtaining, and applying descriptive information and judgmental information about an evaluation’s utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy and its systematic nature, competence, integrity/honesty, respectfulness, and social resp…

  • Lessons in Contracting for Evaluations

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2000•Cited by: 6

    A 1995 evaluation of the U.S. Marine Corps’ personnel evaluation system and a 1991 evaluation of the National Assessment Governing Board procedure for setting cut scores on the mathematics section of the National Assessment of Educational Progress provided valuable lessons in how to minimize the risks of misunderstanding what an evaluation will involve, subversion of the evaluation, controversy, and animosity. Both evaluations were nationally sig…

  • Interdisciplinary Ph.D. Programming in Evaluation

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2001•Cited by: 5

  • A depth study of the evaluation requirement

    Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Theory Into Practice•1966•Cited by: 4•References: 3

    1966). A depth study of the evaluation requirement. Theory Into Practice: Vol. 5, Title 1, pp. 121-133

  • Evaluation Checklists

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2001•Cited by: 3•References: 1

    This article describes a project designed to provide evaluators, their clients, and other stake-holders with checklists for guiding and assessing formative and summative evaluations. The checklists pertain to program, personnel, and product evaluations, and reflect different conceptualizations of evaluation. They are constructed for use in planning, contracting, conducting, reporting, and judging evaluations. The checklists, along with papers on …

  • Encyclopedia of Educational Evaluation

    Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•The Journal of Higher Education•1976•Cited by: 2

  • Egon Guba's Conceptual Journey to Constructivist Evaluation

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Qualitative Inquiry•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 1

  • A Self-Assessment Procedure for Use in Evaluation Training

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam, Lori A Wingate•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2005•Cited by: 1

    This article describes the Self-Assessment of Program Evaluation Expertise instrument and procedure developed to help participants assess their learning gains in a 3-week evaluation institute. Participants completed the instrument in a pre- and posttest format. To reduce both the threat of embarrassment from individual results and the temptation to inflate self-ratings, participants responded anonymously. Although each participant saw her or his …

  • A Note on the Purposes, Development, and Applicability of the Joint Committee Evaluation Standards

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2004•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • Principal evaluation

    Daniel L Stufflebeam, Daniel Stufflebeam et al.•ARTICLE•Peabody Journal of Education•1991•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    (1991). Principal evaluation: New directions for improvement. Peabody Journal of Education: Vol. 68, New Ways to Assess the Performance of School Principals, Part II, pp. 24-46

  • TIP on books

    Daniel L Stufflebeam, Desmond L Cook et al.•ARTICLE•Theory Into Practice•1963

    Findley, Warren G., editor. The Impact and Improvement of School Testing Programs. Sixty‐second Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963. xii + 304 pp. $4.50. Goslin, David A. The Search for Ability: Standardised Testing in Social Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1963. 204 pp. $4.00. Hoffmann, Banesh. The Tyranny of Testing. New York: Crowell‐Collier Press, 1962. 223 pp…

  • A depth study of the evaluation requirement

    Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Theory Into Practice•1966•Cited by: 4•References: 3

    1966). A depth study of the evaluation requirement. Theory Into Practice: Vol. 5, Title 1, pp. 121-133

  • Estimating Test Norms from Variable Size Item and Examinee Samples

    Open Access•Desmond L Cook, Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Educational and Psychological…•1967

  • The availability and importance of evaluative information within the school

    Open Access•David Nevo, Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1976

  • Encyclopedia of Educational Evaluation

    Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•The Journal of Higher Education•1976•Cited by: 2

  • The project to develop standards for educational evaluation

    Open Access•Jeri M Ridings, Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1981

  • Reflections on the movement to promote effective educational evaluations through the use of professional standards

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1983

  • Educational Evaluation and Accountability

    Open Access•George F Madaus, Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Behavioral Scientist•1984•References: 11

  • Coping with the point of entry problem in evaluating projects

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1985

  • The Complete Educator

    William W Cooley, George F Madaus et al.•ARTICLE•Educational Researcher•1990

  • Principal evaluation

    Daniel L Stufflebeam, Daniel Stufflebeam et al.•ARTICLE•Peabody Journal of Education•1991•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    (1991). Principal evaluation: New directions for improvement. Peabody Journal of Education: Vol. 68, New Ways to Assess the Performance of School Principals, Part II, pp. 24-46

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1994

  • Evaluation of superintendent performance

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1995

  • Using professional standards to legally and ethically release evaluation findings

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1999

  • Lessons in Contracting for Evaluations

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2000•Cited by: 6

    A 1995 evaluation of the U.S. Marine Corps’ personnel evaluation system and a 1991 evaluation of the National Assessment Governing Board procedure for setting cut scores on the mathematics section of the National Assessment of Educational Progress provided valuable lessons in how to minimize the risks of misunderstanding what an evaluation will involve, subversion of the evaluation, controversy, and animosity. Both evaluations were nationally sig…

  • Interdisciplinary Ph.D. Programming in Evaluation

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2001•Cited by: 5

  • Evaluation Checklists

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2001•Cited by: 3•References: 1

    This article describes a project designed to provide evaluators, their clients, and other stake-holders with checklists for guiding and assessing formative and summative evaluations. The checklists pertain to program, personnel, and product evaluations, and reflect different conceptualizations of evaluation. They are constructed for use in planning, contracting, conducting, reporting, and judging evaluations. The checklists, along with papers on …

  • The Metaevaluation Imperative

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2001•Cited by: 15•References: 1

    The evaluation field has advanced sufficiently in its methodology and public service that evaluators can and should subject their evaluations to systematic metaevaluation. Metaevaluation is the process of delineating, obtaining, and applying descriptive information and judgmental information about an evaluation’s utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy and its systematic nature, competence, integrity/honesty, respectfulness, and social resp…

  • A Note on the Purposes, Development, and Applicability of the Joint Committee Evaluation Standards

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2004•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • A Self-Assessment Procedure for Use in Evaluation Training

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam, Lori A Wingate•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2005•Cited by: 1

    This article describes the Self-Assessment of Program Evaluation Expertise instrument and procedure developed to help participants assess their learning gains in a 3-week evaluation institute. Participants completed the instrument in a pre- and posttest format. To reduce both the threat of embarrassment from individual results and the temptation to inflate self-ratings, participants responded anonymously. Although each participant saw her or his …

  • A Tribute to Egon Guba

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam, Daniel Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•American Journal of Evaluation•2008

  • Egon Guba's Conceptual Journey to Constructivist Evaluation

    Open Access•Daniel L Stufflebeam•ARTICLE•Qualitative Inquiry•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 1

Psychology (19 works) · Evaluation and Performance Assessment (14 works) · Computer Science (11 works) · Engineering (10 works) · Pedagogy (10 works) · Political science (10 works) · Mathematics education (9 works) · Sociology (8 works) · Evaluation methods (7 works) · Program evaluation (7 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae