Detective Work and Invisible Assessments
Unpacking Discretionary Processes in Welfare Decision‐Making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11197100 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maria G Volckmar‐Eeg (0000-0002-3652-8478, Fafo Institute for Labour and Social Research Oslo Norway), Silje Andresen (0000-0002-4174-1177, Fafo Institute for Labour and Social Research Oslo Norway, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Policy and Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0144-5596 • E-ISSN: 1467-9515 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/spol.70036 |
| OpenAlex | W4416813130 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 37 |
Frontline discretion serves as a core function in welfare delivery. However, little is known about the process between input and output of discretionary assessments. As welfare administrations increasingly explore automated decision‐support systems to improve consistency and efficiency, it becomes crucial to understand the mechanisms and reasoning that underpin caseworkers' decisions. Such understanding is essential to inform future discussions about how automation can coexist with or complement human discretion effectively. Based on extensive fieldwork at frontline offices in Norway's largest welfare institution, Nav, this paper explores how caseworkers use discretion when they gather and interpret information in the assessment of a person's need for welfare services. Our analyses show that caseworkers engage in detective‐like searches for clues across multiple sources of information and that the reasoning guiding these searches often goes undocumented and, therefore, remains invisible. The discretionary assessments are built from numerous small judgements about how to interpret contextual factors and subtle nuances in information, each contributing to the final decision. Unpacking these processes, the article reframes discretion as a continual, situated and interpretive process, moving beyond traditional frameworks in the street‐level bureaucracy literature. The findings contribute to an ongoing scholarly conversation that challenges portrayals of street‐level work as a routine or easily automatable process
Accountability · Bureaucracy · Consistency (knowledge bases · Discretion · Process (computing · Situated · Unpacking · Welfare · Management and Organizational Studies · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Policy and Reform Studies
The Future of the Professions
Discretion in the Welfare State
When the State Meets the Street
Cops, Teachers, Counselors
A Discretionary Toolkit
Meeting (or not) at the street level? A literature review on street‐level research in public management, social policy and social work
Automating activation in Australia
The Category Game and its Impact on Street-Level Bureaucrats and Jobseekers
(In) Accuracy in Algorithmic Profiling of the Unemployed – An Exploratory Review of Reporting Standards
Automating social assistance
Emotional creaming
Revolutionary dreams
I don't know what to do—Could it be cultural?” The operationalization of cultural sensitivity among street‐level workers in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration
Emerging modes of digitalisation in the delivery of welfare‐to‐work
Performance Management, Caseloads and the Frontline Provision of Social Services
Digital coping
Welfare Conditionality and Blaming the Unemployed
Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion
Decision-Making Tools and Their Influence on Caseworkers' Room for Discretion
Veilederblikket
Inside the Welfare Contract
The Work Profiler
Integrity Versus Ideology in Automated Assessment
Accountable Artificial Intelligence
Assessments of Digital Client Representations
State Agent or Citizen Agent
Policy Work
Big Data and AI – A transformational shift for government
Democratic governance in an age of datafication
Making sense of decision support systems
You had to be the Detective
Can Robots Understand Welfare? Exploring Machine Bureaucracies in Welfare-to-Work
Using Artificial Intelligence to classify Jobseekers
Activation Workers' Perceptions of Their Long-term Unemployed Clients' Attitudes towards Employment
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |