Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Public management in turbulent times

Covid‐19 as an ecosystem disruptor

Bibliographic Data

ID11961357
AuthorsErik Eriksson (0000-0001-6599-0963, corresponding author), Erik M Eriksson (0000-0001-8831-9013, Division of Service Management and Logistics, Department of Technology Management and Economics, Centre for Healthcare Improvement Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden, corresponding author), Christian Gadolin (0000-0003-2476-4411, Department of Health Sciences University West Trollhättan Sweden), Göran Lindahl (0000-0003-0007-7270, Division of Building Design, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Centre for Healthcare Architecture Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden), Patrik Alexandersson (Division of Service Management and Logistics, Department of Technology Management and Economics, Centre for Healthcare Improvement Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden), Johanna Eriksson (0000-0003-4545-4914, Division of Building Design, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Centre for Healthcare Architecture Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden)
Year2021
Volume80
Issue4
Pages732-747
Publication date2021-11-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0313-6647 • E-ISSN: 1467-8500
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-8500.12525
OpenAlexW3216514875
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited60

The decentralisation of Swedish healthcare closer to citizens has been slow. Drawing from empirical material of the reform prior and amidst the COVID‐19 pandemic, this paper argues that the pandemic has disrupted the healthcare ecosystem. Consequently, citizen‐centred collaborations have accelerated integration of resources (such as knowledge and skills) across organisational, hierarchical and professional borders. However, collaborations have been delimited to traditional healthcare providers, neglecting the resources of citizens and other actors to be used to improve service delivery. The pandemic has revealed strengths and weaknesses with the prevailing healthcare ecosystem that post‐COVID‐19 public management must address, both theoretically and practically. Theoretically, the paper contributes to the development of a public service logic, addressing both strengths and difficulties with the logic in turbulent times. Practically, the empirical descriptions contribute to improved understanding of public service delivery reform and how it is impacted during the pandemic

Biology · Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Decentralization · Economic growth · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Environmental resource management · Health care · Knowledge management · Pandemic · Political science · Public health · Public healthcare · Public relations · Public service · Service (business · Service delivery framework · Computer Science · Management and Organizational Studies · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Public Policy and Administration Research · Ecology · Marketing

  • Creeping crises and public administration

    Isabella M Nolte, Jörg Lindenmeier•Public Management Review•2024

  • Unveiling third party digital value creation

    Martina Pisarra, Gabriele Infante et al.•Public Management Review•2025

  • OK computer

    Open Access•Barbara Zyzak, Pål Erling Martinussen•Public Management Review•2024

  • Professional work in turbulent times

    Open Access•Emma Pullen, Marlot Kuiper et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2026

  • Public service logic

    Open Access•Carmine Sergianni, Dalibor Brozovic et al.•Public Management Review•2026

  • Reducing the gap between rhetoric and reality

    Open Access•Eric Patterson, Renu Agarwal•Australian Journal of Public…•2023

  • Introduction to Action Research

    Davydd J Greenwood, Davydd Greenwood et al.•Introduction to Action Research•2007

  • Person-Centered Care — Ready for Prime Time

    Open Access•Inger Ekman, Karl Swedberg et al.•European Journal of Cardiovascular…•2011

  • Enterprise Discourse, Professional Identity and the Organizational Control of Hospital Clinicians

    Open Access•Bill Doolin•Organization Studies•2002

  • Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation

    John M Bryson, John Bryson et al.•Public Management Review•2017

  • Public value creation through collaborative innovation

    Barbara C Crosby, Paul ‘t Hart et al.•Public Management Review•2017

  • Following the yellow brick road? (Dis)enchantment with co-design, co-production and value co-creation in public services

    Adina I Dudau, Russ Glennon et al.•Public Management Review•2019

  • The Service Framework

    Open Access•Stephen P Osborne, Zoe Radnor et al.•British Journal of Management•2015

  • From marketing to public value

    Maria Petrescu•Public Management Review•2019

  • Value Co-Creation through Patient Engagement in Health Care

    Wendy Hardyman, Kate L Daunt et al.•Public Management Review•2015

  • Not always co‐creation

    Open Access•Loïc Plé, Rubén Chumpitaz Cáceres et al.•Journal of Services Marketing•2010

  • Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists

    Mats Alvesson•Academy of Management Review•2003

  • Institutions and axioms

    Open Access•Stephen L Vargo, Robert F Lusch•Journal of the Academy of…•2016

  • A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research

    Open Access•A Parasuraman, Valarie A Zeithaml et al.•Journal of Marketing•1985

  • Co-Production, Interdependence and Publicness

    Jonathan Alford, John Alford•Public Management Review•2016

  • Operationalizing Co-Production in Public Services Delivery

    Zoe Radnor, Stephen P Osborne et al.•Public Management Review•2014

  • A Concept Analysis of Person-Centered Care

    Open Access•Stephanie Morgan, Stephanie Suzanne Morgan et al.•Journal of Holistic Nursing•2012

  • Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research

    Open Access•Dennis A Gioia, Kevin G Corley et al.•Organizational Research Methods•2013

  • Continuing the development of the public service logic

    Open Access•Marit Engen, Martin Fransson et al.•Public Management Review•2021

  • The Covid-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems

    Christopher Ansell, Eva Sørensen et al.•Public Management Review•2021

  • Governance-as-legitimacy

    Tony Kinder, Frédérique Six et al.•Public Management Review•2022

  • Governing Turbulence

    Christopher Ansell, Jarle Trondal•Perspectives on Public Management…•2017

  • Age-period-cohort analysis on the cancer mortality in rural China

    Open Access•Peigang Wang, Chunling Xu et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2014

  • Community collaboration to increase foreign-born women ́s participation in a cervical cancer screening program in Sweden

    Open Access•Erik Olsson, Malena Lau et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2014

  • Youth as Partners, Participants or Passive Recipients

    Open Access•Farrah Jacquez, Lisa M Vaughn et al.•American Journal of Community…•2013

  • Nudges against pandemics

    Open Access•J Pierre•Policy and Society•2020

  • Understanding Public Service Innovation as Resource Integration and Creation of Value Propositions

    Open Access•Per Skålén, Jenny Karlsson et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2018

  • Telemedicine co‐design and value co‐creation in public health care

    Open Access•Higor Leite, Ian R Hodgkinson•Australian Journal of Public…•2021

  • Addressing the Increase of Domestic Violence and Abuse During the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Beth Rauhaus, Deborah A Sibila et al.•The American Review of Public…•2020

  • Public Values

    Open Access•Torben Beck Jørgensen, Barry Bozeman•Administration & Society•2007

  • Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector

    Open Access•Eva Sørensen, Jacob Torfing•Administration & Society•2011

  • Balancing Governance Capacity and Legitimacy

    Open Access•Tom Christensen, Per Lægreid•Public Administration Review•2020

  • The Enterprise Formula, New Public Management and the Italian Health Care System

    Open Access•Paola Mattei•Public Administration•2006

  • Critical leadership studies

    Open Access•Mats Alvesson, André Spicer•Human Relations•2012

  • Naturalistic inquiry

    Open Access•Yvonna S Lincoln, Egon G Guba et al.•International Journal of…•1985

  • In Praise of Bureaucracy

    Paul Du Gay•In Praise of Bureaucracy•2000

  • Framing a Needed Discourse on Health Disparities and Social Inequities

    Open Access•Simone Martin‐howard, Kyle Farmbry•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Governance network theory

    Erik-Hans Klijn, Erik‐hans Klijn et al.•Policy & Politics•2012

  • Administrative Burden

    Donald P Moynihan, Denis Moynihan et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2015

  • Modes of Network Governance

    Keith G Provan, Patrick Kenis•Journal of Public Administration…•2007

  • New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance

    Patrick Dunleavy•Journal of Public Administration…•2005

  • In Search of Ordinary People

    Open Access•John Clarke•Communication Culture and Critique•2013

  • Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

    Christopher Ansell, Chris Ansell et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2007

  • Focus Groups

    David L Morgan•Annual Review of Sociology•1996

Unique citing works6
Citations per year2
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae