Public management in turbulent times
Covid‐19 as an ecosystem disruptor
Bibliographic Data
The decentralisation of Swedish healthcare closer to citizens has been slow. Drawing from empirical material of the reform prior and amidst the COVID‐19 pandemic, this paper argues that the pandemic has disrupted the healthcare ecosystem. Consequently, citizen‐centred collaborations have accelerated integration of resources (such as knowledge and skills) across organisational, hierarchical and professional borders. However, collaborations have been delimited to traditional healthcare providers, neglecting the resources of citizens and other actors to be used to improve service delivery. The pandemic has revealed strengths and weaknesses with the prevailing healthcare ecosystem that post‐COVID‐19 public management must address, both theoretically and practically. Theoretically, the paper contributes to the development of a public service logic, addressing both strengths and difficulties with the logic in turbulent times. Practically, the empirical descriptions contribute to improved understanding of public service delivery reform and how it is impacted during the pandemic
Biology · Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Decentralization · Economic growth · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Environmental resource management · Health care · Knowledge management · Pandemic · Political science · Public health · Public healthcare · Public relations · Public service · Service (business · Service delivery framework · Computer Science · Management and Organizational Studies · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Public Policy and Administration Research · Ecology · Marketing
Introduction to Action Research
Person-Centered Care — Ready for Prime Time
Enterprise Discourse, Professional Identity and the Organizational Control of Hospital Clinicians
Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation
Public value creation through collaborative innovation
Following the yellow brick road? (Dis)enchantment with co-design, co-production and value co-creation in public services
The Service Framework
From marketing to public value
Value Co-Creation through Patient Engagement in Health Care
Not always co‐creation
Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists
Institutions and axioms
A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research
Co-Production, Interdependence and Publicness
Operationalizing Co-Production in Public Services Delivery
A Concept Analysis of Person-Centered Care
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research
Continuing the development of the public service logic
The Covid-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems
Governance-as-legitimacy
Governing Turbulence
Age-period-cohort analysis on the cancer mortality in rural China
Community collaboration to increase foreign-born women ́s participation in a cervical cancer screening program in Sweden
Youth as Partners, Participants or Passive Recipients
Nudges against pandemics
Understanding Public Service Innovation as Resource Integration and Creation of Value Propositions
Telemedicine co‐design and value co‐creation in public health care
Addressing the Increase of Domestic Violence and Abuse During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Public Values
Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector
Balancing Governance Capacity and Legitimacy
The Enterprise Formula, New Public Management and the Italian Health Care System
Critical leadership studies
Naturalistic inquiry
In Praise of Bureaucracy
Framing a Needed Discourse on Health Disparities and Social Inequities
Governance network theory
Administrative Burden
Modes of Network Governance
New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance
In Search of Ordinary People
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Focus Groups
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |