When Do We Confront? Perceptions of Costs and Benefits Predict Confronting Discrimination on Behalf of the Self and Others
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12005013 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jessica J Good (0000-0003-3009-1903, Davidson College, corresponding author), Corinne A Moss-Racusin (0000-0002-9824-7524, Yale University), Diana T Sanchez (0000-0002-8684-6183, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 210-226 |
| Publication date | 2012-04-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychology of Women Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0361-6843 • E-ISSN: 1471-6402 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0361684312440958 |
| OpenAlex | W2004843204 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 46 |
| References cited | 51 |
Across two studies, we tested whether perceived social costs and benefits of confrontation would similarly predict confronting discrimination both when it was experienced and when it was observed as directed at others. Female undergraduate participants were asked to recall past experiences and observations of sexism, as well as their confronting behaviors. Path modeling in Study 1 ( N = 148) demonstrated that women were more likely to report confronting if they believed that the confrontation would make a difference (perceived benefits), or they were less concerned about social sanctions (perceived costs), and the prediction patterns were similar for both experienced and observed sexism. Study 2 ( N = 166) replicated the results of Study 1, as well as tested the moderating influence of gender identification. In situations of higher perceived social costs, women who were less strongly identified with their gender group were more responsive to the perceived benefits of the confrontation when deciding whether to confront on behalf of the self. The results of the two studies suggest that researchers should investigate methods for enhancing perceived social benefits and reducing perceived social costs when designing intervention programs aimed at increasing confrontation and decreasing the prevalence of discrimination
Cognitive psychology · Identification (biology · Intervention (counseling · Perception · Recall · Sanctions · Social perception · Clinical Psychology · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
The associations among self-silencing, ambivalent sexism, and perceived devaluation of women in Turkey
A Literature Review of the Measurement of Coping with Stigmatization and Discrimination
Gender Prototypes Hinder Bystander Intervention in Women’s Sexual Harassment
Do Beliefs That Older Adults Are Inflexible Serve as a Barrier to Racial Equality
Power and the confrontation of sexism
Strategic confrontation
How do confronters want perpetrators to respond? Defining successful confrontation as the match between desired and actual outcomes
White’s Perceptions of Biracial Individuals’ Race Shift When Biracials Speak Out Against Bias
Psychophysiological Stress Responses to Bicultural and Biracial Identity Denial
Help to perpetuate traditional gender roles
Making the impossible possible? Framing confrontations of racism on social media as norm-setting
Social costs of bias confrontation are persistent but independent of bias reduction
Men’s responses to being confronted for sexism with and without humor
Thanks, But No Thanks
Perceiving and Confronting Sexism
Bystander Intervention During College Women’s Experiences of Gender Prejudice
When compliments fail to flatter
Beyond confronting
No Time Like The Present
A Review of Organizational Strategies for Reducing Sexual Harassment
More Than Meets the ERN
Microaggressions in social work classrooms
But that was meant to be a compliment!”
Social norms of prejudice confrontations impact anticipated costs and benefits of confronting prejudice
Aggressive confrontation shapes perceptions and attitudes toward racist content online
Prejudice confrontation styles
Don’t laugh it off
Gender differences in using humor to respond to sexist jokes
Mobilizing bystanders to address microaggressions in the workplace
Powerless people don't yell but tell
Acting in Solidarity
Identity Questioning
Do You Say Something When It's Your Boss? The Role of Perpetrator Power in Prejudice Confrontation
A (costly) penny for your thoughts? Allies cause harm by seeking marginalized group members' help when confronting prejudice
European Americans' intentions to confront racial bias
A hero for the outgroup, a black sheep for the ingroup
They don’t mean to hurt
Confronting the “F” Word
Gender Differences in Anticipated but Not Behavioral Confrontation of Heterosexist Comments
Race, Locality, and Representative Bureaucracy
Effects of Parental Workplace Discrimination on Sickness Presenteeism
Implications of gender metastereotypes for addressing sexist behavior
People Judge Male Sexism More Leniently When Women Emasculate Men
A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification
Confronting as autonomy promotion
Myths and Reality About Confronting Anti-Gay Prejudice
The Confronting Prejudiced Responses (CPR) Model
Who Confronts Prejudice?
Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination
Social identity as both cause and effect
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Ethnic Identity Moderates Perceptions of Prejudice
Stop Complaining! The Social Costs of Making Attributions to Discrimination
Rebels with a Cause
Confronting Prejudice (Literally)
Self‐Recording of Everyday Life Events
“I’m not a feminist, but…”
Collective action
When men break the gender rules
Confronting Perpetrators of Prejudice
Seeing the Unseen
Disavowing Social Identities
Sexist Discrimination May Account for Well-Known Gender Differences in Psychiatric Symptoms
A Stress and Coping Perspective on Confronting Sexism
Testing a Model of Women's Personal Sense of Justice, Control, Well-Being, and Distress in the Context of Sexist Discrimination
Confronting Sexism
Respected or Rejected
Resisting Prejudice Every Day
Individual and Situational Factors Related to Young Women’s Likelihood of Confronting Sexism in Their Everyday Lives
Predictors and Correlates of Collective Action
Racism and Sexism as Correlates of African American Women’s Psychological Distress
Ingroup identification and relative deprivation
Doing gender differently—The interplay of strength of gender identification and content of gender identity in predicting women's endorsement of sexist beliefs
Real Versus Imagined Gender Harassment
Everyday Sexism
Putting the brakes on prejudice
The unexpectedly positive consequences of confronting sexism
Group identification moderates attitudes toward ingroup members who confront discrimination
Excuse Me—What Did You Just Say
Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem
Wimpy and undeserving of respect
The Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Questionnaire
Proneness to prejudiced responses
African American College Students’ Experiences With Everyday Racism
The role of racial identity in perceived racial discrimination
Sticking together or falling apart
Standing up for a change
Prejudice with and without compunction
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Group-level self-definition and self-investment
Practical Issues in Structural Modeling
| Unique citing works | 46 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,29 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 46 |