Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Understanding users’ responses to disclosed vs. undisclosed customer service chatbots

A mixed methods study

Bibliographic Data

ID20396506
AuthorsMargot J van der Goot (0000-0001-6904-6515, University of Amsterdam, corresponding author), Nathalie Koubayová (0000-0002-6741-0747, Charles University), Eva A Van Reijmersdal (0000-0002-3950-3524, University of Amsterdam)
Year2024
Volume39
Issue6
Pages2947-2960
Publication date2024-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAI & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0951-5666 • E-ISSN: 1435-5655
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s00146-023-01818-7
OpenAlexW4390619488
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited33

Due to huge advancements in natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning, chatbots are gaining significance in the field of customer service. For users, it may be hard to distinguish whether they are communicating with a human or a chatbot. This brings ethical issues, as users have the right to know who or what they are interacting with (European Commission in Regulatory framework proposal on artificial intelligence. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai , 2022). One of the solutions is to include a disclosure at the start of the interaction (e.g., “this is a chatbot”). However, companies are reluctant to use disclosures, as consumers may perceive artificial agents as less knowledgeable and empathetic than their human counterparts (Luo et al. in Market Sci 38(6):937–947, 2019). The current mixed methods study, combining qualitative interviews ( n = 8) and a quantitative experiment ( n = 194), delves into users’ responses to a disclosed vs. undisclosed customer service chatbot, focusing on source orientation, anthropomorphism, and social presence. The qualitative interviews reveal that it is the willingness to help the customer and the friendly tone of voice that matters to the users, regardless of the artificial status of the customer care representative. The experiment did not show significant effects of the disclosure (vs. non-disclosure). Implications for research, legislators and businesses are discussed

Business · Chatbot · Customer care · Customer service · Internet privacy · Knowledge management · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sociology · World Wide Web · AI in Service Interactions · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Psychology · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Marketing

  • Human-machine in the vortex of digital synergy

    Open Access•Václav Moravec, Beata Gavurova et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • AI Mimicry and Human Dignity

    Open Access•Jan‐Willem van der Rijt, Dimitri Coelho Mollo et al.•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2026

  • The impact of prior chatbot identity disclosure on customer tolerance of service failures

    Tiange Li, Chubing Zhang et al.•Internet Research•2025

  • Helpful, harmless, honest? Sociotechnical limits of AI alignment and safety through Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

    Open Access•Adam Dahlgren Lindström, Leila Methnani et al.•Ethics and Information Technology•2025

  • Living up to the chatbot hype

    Open Access•Theo Araujo•Computers in Human Behavior•2018

  • Voices in and of the machine

    Open Access•Andrea L Guzman•Computers in Human Behavior•2019

  • Anthropomorphism of computers

    Open Access•Youjeong Kim, Sundar et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2012

  • ChatGPT

    Open Access•Eva A M van Dis, Johan Bollen et al.•Nature•2023

  • “I Am Here to Assist You Today”

    Carolin Ischen, Theo Araujo et al.•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2020

  • See you soon again, chatbot? A design taxonomy to characterize user-chatbot relationships with different time horizons

    Open Access•Marcia Nißen, Driton Selimi et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • Dual humanness and trust in conversational AI

    Open Access•Peng Hu, Yaobin Lu et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Making conversations with chatbots more personalized

    Open Access•Michael Shumanov, Lester W Johnson et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Nisreen Ameen, Ali Tarhini et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • “In A.I. we trust?” The effects of parasocial interaction and technopian versus luddite ideological views on chatbot-based customer relationship management in the emerging “feeling economy”

    Open Access•Seounmi Youn, Seung‐a Annie Jin et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Application of humanization to survey chatbots

    Open Access•Jungwook Rhim, Minji Kwak et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • “Please understand we cannot provide further information”

    Open Access•Alexander J Wulf, Ognyan Seizov•AI & Society•2024

  • Failure of chatbot Tay was evil, ugliness and uselessness in its nature or do we judge it through cognitive shortcuts and biases

    Open Access•Tomáš Zemčík•AI & Society•2021

  • The quest for appropriate models of human-likeness

    Open Access•Nils Klowait•AI & Society•2018

  • Humanizing chatbots

    Open Access•Eun Go, Sundar•Computers in Human Behavior•2019

  • Chatbots

    Open Access•P B Brandtzaeg, Asbjørn Følstad•interactions•2018

  • Virtual Customer Service Agents

    Open Access•Tibert Verhagen, Jaap van Nes et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2014

  • Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence

    Frank Biocca, Chad Harms et al.•PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented…•2003

  • Crowdsourcing research

    Kim Bartel Sheehan•Communication Monographs•2017

  • Overcoming polarization with chatbot news? Investigating the impact of news content containing opposing views on agreement and credibility

    Open Access•Brahim Zarouali, Mykola Makhortykh et al.•European Journal of Communication•2021

  • Measurement of Latent Variables With Different Rating Scales

    Open Access•Natalja Menold, Anja Tausch•Sociological Methods & Research•2016

  • Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents

    Open Access•Kwan Min Lee, Younbo Jung et al.•International Journal of…•2006

  • Machines and Mindlessness

    Open Access•Clifford, Clifford Nass et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2000

  • Presence, Explicated

    Open Access•Kwan Min Lee•Communication Theory•2004

Citations per year4
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae