Understanding users’ responses to disclosed vs. undisclosed customer service chatbots
A mixed methods study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20396506 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Margot J van der Goot (0000-0001-6904-6515, University of Amsterdam, corresponding author), Nathalie Koubayová (0000-0002-6741-0747, Charles University), Eva A Van Reijmersdal (0000-0002-3950-3524, University of Amsterdam) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 2947-2960 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AI & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0951-5666 • E-ISSN: 1435-5655 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00146-023-01818-7 |
| OpenAlex | W4390619488 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 33 |
Due to huge advancements in natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning, chatbots are gaining significance in the field of customer service. For users, it may be hard to distinguish whether they are communicating with a human or a chatbot. This brings ethical issues, as users have the right to know who or what they are interacting with (European Commission in Regulatory framework proposal on artificial intelligence. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai , 2022). One of the solutions is to include a disclosure at the start of the interaction (e.g., “this is a chatbot”). However, companies are reluctant to use disclosures, as consumers may perceive artificial agents as less knowledgeable and empathetic than their human counterparts (Luo et al. in Market Sci 38(6):937–947, 2019). The current mixed methods study, combining qualitative interviews ( n = 8) and a quantitative experiment ( n = 194), delves into users’ responses to a disclosed vs. undisclosed customer service chatbot, focusing on source orientation, anthropomorphism, and social presence. The qualitative interviews reveal that it is the willingness to help the customer and the friendly tone of voice that matters to the users, regardless of the artificial status of the customer care representative. The experiment did not show significant effects of the disclosure (vs. non-disclosure). Implications for research, legislators and businesses are discussed
Business · Chatbot · Customer care · Customer service · Internet privacy · Knowledge management · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sociology · World Wide Web · AI in Service Interactions · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Psychology · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Marketing
Living up to the chatbot hype
Voices in and of the machine
Anthropomorphism of computers
ChatGPT
“I Am Here to Assist You Today”
See you soon again, chatbot? A design taxonomy to characterize user-chatbot relationships with different time horizons
Dual humanness and trust in conversational AI
Making conversations with chatbots more personalized
Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence
“In A.I. we trust?” The effects of parasocial interaction and technopian versus luddite ideological views on chatbot-based customer relationship management in the emerging “feeling economy”
Application of humanization to survey chatbots
“Please understand we cannot provide further information”
Failure of chatbot Tay was evil, ugliness and uselessness in its nature or do we judge it through cognitive shortcuts and biases
The quest for appropriate models of human-likeness
Humanizing chatbots
Chatbots
Virtual Customer Service Agents
Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence
Crowdsourcing research
Overcoming polarization with chatbot news? Investigating the impact of news content containing opposing views on agreement and credibility
Measurement of Latent Variables With Different Rating Scales
Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents
Machines and Mindlessness
Presence, Explicated
| Citations per year | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |