Mapping the Generative AI Research in Higher Education
2022–2024 Insights
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21592500 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Isak Froumin (0000-0001-9228-3770, Constructor University Bremen Germany), Anton Vorochkov (0000-0003-1219-8635, Research Group on Supranational Education Policies Autonomous University of Madrid Madrid Spain), Margarita Kiryushina (0000-0002-4576-5926, Faculty of Education in Science and Technology Technion Israel Institute of Technology Haifa Israel), Daria Platonova (0000-0002-8798-3243, Constructor Knowledge Labs, Constructor University Bremen Germany, corresponding author), Evgeniy Terentev (0000-0002-3438-2786, Institute of Education HSE University Moscow Russia) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Higher Education Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0951-5224 • E-ISSN: 1468-2273 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/hequ.70075 |
| OpenAlex | W4416227246 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 33 |
This study analyses over 4000 publications, including those from 2024, indexed in the Scopus database, aiming to describe the landscape of the growing body of research exploring the role of generative AI in higher education. We followed an inclusive approach to publication formats and languages, incorporating not only traditional peer‐reviewed articles but also conference proceedings and preprints. Our analysis focuses on two key dimensions—general characteristics of publications, including publication types, journals, subject areas, countries, languages, and collaboration patterns—and content analysis, covering topics, methodologies, and sentiment. Among the main findings, we identify that the majority of studies focus on individual‐level analysis, with a lack of comparative institutional‐ and national‐level perspectives. Clear regional clusters of AI research have emerged, but a significant gap remains in the form of comparative studies. Topic‐wise, there is a visible shift from the technical capabilities of AI systems to their practical implementation, ethical concerns, and integration into educational frameworks. Finally, although the field anticipates the use of advanced research methods, most studies still rely on isolated case studies, surveys and simple experimental designs
Generative grammar · Generative model · Scopus · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Online Learning and Analytics
Transforming Education
A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks
Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level
What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature
A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice
Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Using large‐scale bibliometric data in higher education research
Positivity bias in higher education research
The use of methods
Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
ChatGPT
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |