Reimagining school-university partnerships in physical education
A collaborative design to approach democratic professionalism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21783911 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luiza Lana Gonçalves (0000-0003-4140-2463, Federation University, corresponding author), Kamila Santos Silva (0009-0000-8815-2903, Secretaria Municipal de Educação de São Paulo), Leonardo Liziero (0009-0004-9541-6355, Ana Lúcia de Oliveira Municipal School, Municipal Education Secretary), Melissa Parker (0000-0003-0829-2741, University of Limerick), Dirceu Santos Silva (0000-0002-4557-4118, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1740-8989 • E-ISSN: 1742-5786 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17408989.2025.2463529 |
| OpenAlex | W4407284837 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 36 |
Background: An established body of research illuminates the benefits of school-university partnerships as opportunities for teachers’ professional development. Concomitantly, studies highlight power imbalances between schools and universities, challenges may form from the hierarchical structures within those partnerships. Consequently, it remains necessary to consider partnerships that foster democratic and collective agency amongst all actors involved in those partnerships in order to advance changes in the teaching profession. This paper is grounded in Sachs’ notions of viewing the teaching profession as democratic and managerial (2001; 2016). In this current paper, rather than presenting democratic and managerial approaches as two separate entities, they are presented here as a continuum on which university lecturers, mentor-teachers, and pre-service teachers, navigate, constantly facing diverse challenges to structure a democratic school-university partnership.Purpose: This study explored a school-university partnership in physical education teacher education. Specifically, we were interested in what features contributed to (or hindered) the development of mentor teachers’ (MT), teacher educators’, and pre-service teachers’ (PST) democratic professionalism.Method: An 18-month school-university partnership in the Institutional Program of Teaching Initiation, Brazil, was the project’s focus. The action research participants were 19 PSTs, two MTs, a teacher educator-facilitator, and a critical friend. Data sources included: weekly meetings with the PIBID group (43), between MTs and facilitator (39), and facilitator and critical friend (8); mid and final-term PST focus groups; interviews (14); and diaries (22). Reflexive and inductive thematic analysis were used to analyze the data.Findings: Three themes reflect how this school-university partnership cultivated teachers’ democratic professionalism. These themes are (1) enacting democratic practices as a group, (2) fostering participants’ agency, and (3) addressing power inequalities in a democratic space. The first theme includes diverse strategies (e.g. listening-to-respond, respecting affective connections, and acknowledging PSTs’ learning pace) developed within the project. The second theme relates to the challenges, the engagement in critical reflection, and the constant struggles against inequalities in the group context. The third theme concerns participants’ recognition of the partnership as a democratic space, albeit carrying power inequalities (e.g. organization of the program, context of education, and hierarchical relationships).Conclusion: The school-university partnership created spaces for participants to learn together about the teaching profession. A democratic structure included teachers as co-leaders of the program, PSTs’ needs as the starting point of action, and a critical and reflective approach as a practice of the group. Educating (future) teachers to disrupt a managerial view of their profession is necessary. By seeking collaboration, collective action, and the fostering of a less hierarchical and more egalitarian space, participants experimented and engaged with a democratic view of the teaching profession
Democracy · Engineering ethics · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Engineering · Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport · Physical Education and Pedagogy · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Smart Campus Transformation Governance in the Global South
Teaching as a profession of human interaction
Project-based learning via school-university collaboration
Embedding practitioner research as a pedagogy for social justice in physical education teacher education
Educating for hope
Towards embodied criticality
Becoming activist teacher educators
Understanding continuing professional development
Teacher professionalism
Thematic Analysis
‘We united to defend ourselves and face our struggles’
Becoming Critical
Thematic Analysis
Ninjas, zombies and nervous wrecks? Academics in the neoliberal world of physical education and sport pedagogy
An investigation of pre-service teachers’ learning in physical education teacher education
School–university partnerships and physical education teacher education student learning
Understanding US Pete Faculty Stress in the Sociopolitical Environment of Higher Education
The new professionalism
Os trabalhadores da educação e a construção política da profissão docente no Brasil
Teacher professional identity
The Sage Handbook of Action Research
Discursos do profissionalismo docente paradoxos e alternativas conceptuais
Trabalho, carreira, desenvolvimento docente e mudança na prática educativa
Rethinking the Connections Between Campus Courses and Field Experiences in College- and University-Based Teacher Education
Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education
Validity in qualitative research revisited
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |