Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Determinants of Chatbot Brand Trust in the Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

Bibliographic Data

ID22041807
AuthorsOluwanife Segun Falebita (0000-0002-8287-4005, University of Zululand, corresponding author), Joshua Abah Abah (0000-0001-5485-9396, University of Zululand), Akorede Ayoola Asanre (0000-0003-2787-2346, University of Zululand), Taiwo Oluwadayo Abiodun (0000-0003-2614-2229, Tai Solarin University of Education), Musa Adekunle Ayanwale (0000-0001-7640-9898, University of Johannesburg), Olubunmi Kayode Ayanwoye (0000-0001-7196-6302, Federal University Oye Ekiti)
Year2025
Volume15
Issue10
Pages1389
Publication date2025-10-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducation Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/educsci15101389
OpenAlexW4415279341
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited60

The use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots in brands is growing exponentially, and higher education institutions are not unaware of how such tools effectively shape the attitudes and behavioral intentions of students. These chatbots are able to synthesize an enormous amount of data input and can create contextually aware, human-like conversational content that is not limited to simple scripted responses. This study examines the factors that determine chatbot brand trust in the adoption of GenAI in higher education. By extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with the construct of brand trust, the study introduces a novel contribution to the literature, offering fresh insights into how trust in GenAI chatbots is developed within the academic context. Using the convenience sampling technique, a sample of 609 students from public universities in North Central and Southwestern Nigeria was selected. The collected data were analyzed via partial least squares structural equation modelling. The results indicated that attitudes toward chatbots determine behavioral intentions and GenAI chatbot brand trust. Surprisingly, behavioral intentions do not affect GenAI chatbot brand trust. Similarly, the perceived ease of use of chatbots does not determine behavioral intention or attitudes toward GenAI chatbot adoption but rather determines perceived usefulness. Additionally, the perceived usefulness of chatbots affects behavioral intention and attitudes toward GenAI chatbot adoption. Moreover, social influence affects behavioral intention, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and attitudes toward GenAI chatbot adoption. The implications of the findings for higher education institutions are that homegrown GenAI chatbots that align with the principles of the institution should be developed, creating an environment that promotes a positive attitude toward these technologies. Specifically, the study recommends that policymakers and university administrators establish clear institutional guidelines for the design, deployment, and ethical use of homegrown GenAI chatbots, ensuring alignment with educational goals and safeguarding student trust

Chatbot · Higher education · Institution · Structural equation modeling · Technology Acceptance Model · Usability · Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research · Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour

  • An integrative study of factors influencing university students’ acceptance of AI chatbot technology

    Open Access•BaiXin Xu, Jun Ang et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R

    Open Access•Joseph F Hair, G Tomas M Hult et al.•Partial Least Squares Structural…•2021

  • Analyzing and Interpreting Data From Likert-Type Scales

    Gail M Sullivan, Anthony R Artino•Journal of Graduate Medical…•2013

  • Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce

    D Harrison McKnight, Vivek Choudhury et al.•Information Systems Research•2002

  • E-commerce

    Open Access•David Gefen•Omega•2000

  • An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research

    Open Access•Joe Hair, Joe F Hair et al.•Industrial Management & Data…•2017

  • Risk, trust, and the interaction of perceived ease of use and behavioral control in predicting consumers’ use of social media for transactions

    Open Access•Jens Morten Hansen, Jared M Hansen et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2018

  • “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms”

    Open Access•Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan, Na Li et al.•Education and Information…•2023

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  • User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Viswanath Venkatesh, Venkatesh Venkatesh et al.•MIS Quarterly•2003

  • A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

    Open Access•Jörg Henseler, Christian M Ringle et al.•Journal of the Academy of…•2015

  • When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM

    Open Access•Joseph F Hair, Jeffrey J Risher et al.•European Business Review•2019

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Open Access•Claes Fornell, David F Larcker•Journal of Marketing Research•1981

  • A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model

    Open Access•Vivek Venkatesh, Viswanath Venkatesh et al.•Management Science•2000

  • Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)

    Open Access•Joe F Hair Jr, Joe F Hair et al.•European Business Review•2014

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling

    Open Access•Ilker Etikan•American Journal of Theoretical…•2016

  • Integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

    Open Access•Jorge Cordero, Jonathan Torres-Zambrano et al.•Education Sciences•2024

  • “To Use or Not to Use?” A Mixed-Methods Study on the Determinants of EFL College Learners’ Behavioral Intention to Use AI in the Distributed Learning Context

    Open Access•Hanwei Wu, Ran Zhi et al.•The International Review of…•2024

  • How users cognitively appraise and emotionally experience the metaverse

    Open Access•Ayoung Suh•Information Technology and People•2024

  • Hi! Tell me how to do it

    Open Access•Beyza Aksu Dünya, Hatice Yıldız Durak•Quality & Quantity•2024

  • A framework of attitudes towards technology in theory and practice

    Open Access•Christian Kerschner, Melf-Hinrich Ehlers•Ecological Economics•2016

  • Importance of University Students’ Perception of Adoption and Training in Artificial Intelligence Tools

    Open Access•José Carlos Vázquez-Parra, Carolina Henao-Rodríguez et al.•Societies•2024

  • Comprehensive Analysis of the Effect of Social Influence and Brand Image on Purchase Intention

    Open Access•Shi-Zhu Liang, Jia-Lu Xu et al.•SAGE Open•2024

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae