Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Monitoring event-driven dynamics on Twitter

A case study in Belarus

Bibliographic Data

ID22229136
AuthorsNatalie M Rice (0000-0002-3118-0302, University of Tennessee at Knoxville), Benjamin D Horne (0000-0002-5779-3019, University of Tennessee at Knoxville), Catherine A Luther (0000-0001-6117-7211, University of Tennessee at Knoxville), Joshua Borycz (0000-0002-1505-148X, Vanderbilt University), Suzanne Allard (0000-0001-9421-3848, University of Tennessee at Knoxville), Damian J Ruck (0000-0001-8678-8852, University of Tennessee at Knoxville), Michael Fitzgerald (0000-0002-2161-3792, University of Tennessee at Knoxville), Oleg Manaev (0000-0002-1517-3997, University of Tennessee at Knoxville), Baukje Prins (0000-0001-5893-2167, University of Tennessee at Knoxville), Maureen Taylor (0000-0002-9420-3591, University of Technology Sydney), R A Bentley (0000-0001-9086-2197, Knoxville College, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume2
Issue4
Pages36-36
Publication date2022-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSN Social Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2662-9283 • E-ISSN: 2662-9283
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s43545-022-00330-x
PMID35434643
OpenAlexW4225688148
LanguageEN
References cited66

Analysts of social media differ in their emphasis on the effects of message content versus social network structure. The balance of these factors may change substantially across time. When a major event occurs, initial independent reactions may give way to more social diffusion of interpretations of the event among different communities, including those committed to disinformation. Here, we explore these dynamics through a case study analysis of the Russian-language Twitter content emerging from Belarus before and after its presidential election of August 9, 2020. From these Russian-language tweets, we extracted a set of topics that characterize the social media data and construct networks to represent the sharing of these topics before and after the election. The case study in Belarus reveals how misinformation can be re-invigorated in discourse through the novelty of a major event. More generally, it suggests how audience networks can shift from influentials dispensing information before an event to a de-centralized sharing of information after it

Computer security · Data science · Disinformation · Homophily · Information cascade · Microblogging · Misinformation · Novelty · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Social media · Social network analysis · Sociology · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • What Is an Event?

    Robin Wagner-Pacifici•What Is an Event?•2017

  • Becoming Human

    Open Access•M Tomasello•Becoming Human•2019

  • False equivalencies

    Open Access•Deen Freelon, Arthur Marwick et al.•Science•2020

  • Error and attack tolerance of complex networks

    Open Access•Richard Albert, Réka Albert et al.•Nature•2000

  • The Parable of Google Flu

    Open Access•David Lazer, Ryan Kennedy et al.•Science•2014

  • Analyzing the Digital Traces of Political Manipulation

    Adam Badawy, Emilio Ferrara et al.•2018 IEEE/ACM International…•2018

  • Finding scientific topics

    Open Access•Thomas L Griffiths, Mark Steyvers•Proceedings of the National…•2004

  • A density-based method for adaptive LDA model selection

    Open Access•Juan Cao, Tian Xia et al.•Neurocomputing•2009

  • Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks

    Open Access•Sinan Aral, D Walker•Science•2012

  • The rise of social bots

    Open Access•Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol et al.•Communications of the ACM•2016

  • The Web of False Information

    Open Access•Savvas Zannettou, Michael Sirivianos et al.•Journal of Data and Information…•2019

  • Mere Exposure

    Open Access•Robert B Zajonc•Current Directions in Psychological…•2001

  • LDAvis

    Open Access•Carson Sievert, Kenneth Shirley et al.•Proceedings of the Workshop on…•2014

  • The Diffusion of Microfinance

    Open Access•Abhijit Banerjee, Arun G Chandrasekhar et al.•Science•2013

  • A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization

    Open Access•Robert M Bond, Christopher J Fari et al.•Nature•2012

  • Understanding and sharing intentions

    Open Access•M Tomasello, Malinda Carpenter et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2005

  • The Acceleration of Cultural Change

    R A Bentley, John Maeda et al.•Acceleration of Cultural Change•2017

  • Internet Research Agency Twitter activity predicted 2016 U.S. election polls

    Open Access•Damian J Ruck, Natalie M Rice et al.•First Monday•2019

  • Cross-Platform State Propaganda

    Open Access•Yevgeniy Golovchenko, Cody Buntain et al.•The International Journal of…•2020

  • Social Antinomies of Linguistic Consciousness

    Elena V Kravchenko, Elena Kravchenko et al.•Communist and Post-Communist…•2020

  • Fighting for the Soviet Union 2.0

    Open Access•Ivan Kozachenko•Communist and Post-Communist…•2019

  • The Two-Step Flow of Communication in Twitter-Based Public Forums

    Open Access•Sujin Choi•Social Science Computer Review•2014

  • Does Russian Propaganda Work

    T P Gerber, Jane Zavisca et al.•The Washington Quarterly•2016

  • Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language

    William J Turkel, Robin Dunbar•Language•1999

  • Weaponized Health Communication

    David Broniatowski, David A Broniatowski et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2018

  • Terrorism in Cyberspace

    Open Access•David Benson•Political Science Quarterly•2016

  • From Liberation to Turmoil

    Open Access•Joshua A Tucker, Yannis Theocharis et al.•Journal of democracy•2017

  • Online Social Media and Political Awareness in Authoritarian Regimes

    Open Access•Ora John Reuter, David Szakonyi•British Journal of Political…•2015

  • Diasporas and democratization in the post-communist world

    Open Access•Maria Koinova•Communist and Post-Communist…•2009

  • Psychological adaptations for assessing gossip veracity

    Open Access•Nicole H He, E H Hagen•Human Nature•2006

  • The Multiple Facets of Influence

    Open Access•Elizabeth Dubois, Devin Gaffney•American Behavioral Scientist•2014

  • Anger, Fear, and Echo Chambers

    Open Access•Dag Wollebæk, Rune Karlsen et al.•Social Media + Society•2019

  • Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks

    Mark Rivera, Mark T Rivera et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2010

  • Theorizing the Restlessness of Events

    Robin Wagner-Pacifici, Robin Wagner‐pacifici•American Journal of Sociology•2010

  • Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation

    Duncan J Watts, Peter Sheridan Dodds•Journal of Consumer Research•2007

  • Mesolevel Networks and the Diffusion of Social Movements

    Peter Hedström, Rickard Sandell et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2000

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae