Participatory action research with additional language teachers
A methodological review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22422381 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ryosuke Aoyama (0000-0002-3198-2284, University of British Columbia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-14 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language Teaching Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1362-1688 • E-ISSN: 1477-0954 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/13621688261445059 |
| OpenAlex | W7161110914 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 66 |
Scholars and community members have long utilized participatory action research (PAR) to strategize local efforts to address real-world problems across various disciplines, including education. Applied linguistics and language education have also embraced and echoed the PAR tenets that situate the locus of knowledge production within local communities, aiming to co-construct ethical praxis for socially just change. However, there are few methodological syntheses of PAR studies in additional language education, despite ongoing calls to promote such a democratic research methodology to effect societal change. Aiming to bring greater methodological clarity regarding PAR in language education research, this article reviews methodological issues, synthesizing PAR in theory and PAR in practice. Drawing on a methodological review approach, it analyzes 23 PAR studies published between 2014 and 2024 that involved teacher participants in additional language education. The review focuses on how the three components of ‘participation,’ ‘action,’ and ‘research’ are framed and represented in these studies. Findings highlight various methodological discussion points in PAR in practice, such as the orientation of action, group formation, naming practices and authorship, positionality statements, participant engagement in data analysis, and methodological frameworks. Based on the findings, the review proposes a set of reflective questions as starting points for dialogue among PAR practitioners. These questions will help explore ways to make PAR more participatory, and in turn, co-construct ethical and impactful PAR for social change.
Action research · Applied linguistics · Citizen journalism · CLARITY · Participatory action research · Praxis · Health Policy Implementation Science · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Critical Discourse Analysis in Applied Linguistics
Working Method
The Action Research Planner
Research Methods in Education
Action and Knowledge
Critical Applied Linguistics
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Co-constructing Social Justice
Applied Linguists Cultivating Relationships for Justice
Participatory action research in a listening-speaking class in second language teaching
Supporting formative assessment in the second language classroom
Democratising knowledge through action research
A typology of secondary research in Applied Linguistics
Implementation of a Western-based Multiliteracies Pedagogy in Malaysia
Linking Research to transforming the real world
Re-Examining and Re-Envisioning Criticality in Language Studies
Participatory Action Research
Towards Methodologically Inclusive Research Syntheses
Education, Participatory Action Research, and Social Change
Crafting Qualitative Research
Participatory Action Research
Principles for Participatory Action Research
Participatory Action Research
Participatory Action Research
Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods
A methodological review of qualitative research syntheses in Call
Aquí No Hay Pobrecitos
Teaching Out Loud
Transdisciplinary qualitative paradigm in applied linguistics
Critical Participatory Action Research
Systematic review, systematic bias? An example from EMI research
Alternatives in Tesol Research
Action Research and Minority Problems
Tu lucha es mi lucha”
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Teacher participatory action research (TPAR)
Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis
The Application of Participatory Action-Research in Latin America
Where Are the Missing Coauthors? Authorship Practices in Participatory Research
| Highly cited | No |
|---|