The dark side of defection

Security force defectors and the aftermath of nonviolent revolutions

Bibliographic Data

ID24225129
AuthorsSean Paul Ashley (0000-0002-6081-3156, Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD)
Year2026
Volume63
Issue2
Pages139-152
Publication date2026-03-23
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Peace Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/jopres/xjaf014
OpenAlexW7131466362
LanguageEN
References cited74

When do nonviolent revolutions result in stable democratic regimes? Existing scholarship is optimistic about the positive relationship between nonviolent revolutionary transitions and postrevolutionary democracy. However, several regimes established following nonviolent revolutions fail to consolidate into democracy, often being derailed by coups and civil wars. Nevertheless, we know comparatively little about when and why nonviolent revolutions lead to unstable or undemocratic regimes. I theorize that security force defection during nonviolent revolutions undermines stability and democratic consolidation in the regimes that follow. Security force defectors possess distinctive motives, opportunities, and coercive capabilities that equip them to destabilize democracy in the postrevolutionary era. Empirical analysis using global data capturing nonviolent revolutions from 1945 to 2013 reveals that security force defection both significantly increases the likelihood of postrevolutionary coups and civil wars and diminishes the democratic character of postrevolutionary regimes. This article thereby revises the scholarly consensus regarding the benefits of security force defection during nonviolent revolutionary movements.

Civil war · democratic backsliding · Democratic consolidation · nonviolent revolution · regime stability · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance · Political Theory and Democracy

Tools

Open DOI