Generic qualitative dissertations in counselor education
A content analysis
Bibliographic Data
We conducted a content analysis of generic qualitative counseling dissertations (GQR;N = 70), examining their methodological justifications, coherence, and trustworthiness. Dissertations authors often presented vague methodological justifications. Findings have implications for constructing methodological justifications, integrating relevant literature, and awareness of how GQR compares to other qualitative methodologies
Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) · Content (measure theory) · Content analysis · Counselor education · Engineering ethics · Higher education · Pedagogy · Qualitative analysis · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Trustworthiness · Counseling Practices and Supervision · Psychology · Reflective Practices in Education · Social Psychology
Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice
Toward Praxis, Promise, and Futures of Intersectionality in Multimethod Counseling Research
Is it any Clearer? Generic Qualitative Inquiry and the VSAIEEDC Model of Data Analysis
Generic Qualitative Research in Psychology
Naturalistic inquiry
A Content Analysis of Qualitative Dissertations in Counselor Education
A 15-Year Content Analysis of Three Qualitative Research Traditions
Generic Qualitative Approaches
Clear as Mud
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |