É possível Educação em Educação a Distância? Reflexões a partir da ética da responsabilidade de Levinas e do Eros transcendental de Gur-Ze'ev

Bibliographic Data

ID3949088
AuthorsBruno Antonio Picoli (0000-0001-6831-2199, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul), Alexandre Guilherme (0000-0003-4578-1894, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul)
Year2020
Volume15
Pages1-21
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePraxis Educativa (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1809-4031 • E-ISSN: 1809-4309
PublisherUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5212/praxeduc.v.16244.089
OpenAlexW3045230747
LanguagePT
References cited12

The purpose of this reflection was to investigate whether a “language of education” is possible in the Distance learning modalities, more specifically if, in Distance learning, it is possible to create conditions for the responsible response to the call of the Other, for ethical dialog, and if possibilities for the subject to be constituted as a being beyond what was modeled to be, for transcendence are offered. Based on a bibliographic research, especially on Levinas and Gur-Ze’ev’s works, it was sought to develop a “language of education” that does not limit the educational relationship to the “language of learning”. It was concluded that Distance learning does not offer conditions for transcendental Eros, for the encounter of the ethical self with the Other, and it also creates barriers that prevent this encounter and imprison the “subject” in his/her network of pleasures and self-satisfaction. Keywords: Distance learning. Language of learning. Language of education. Ethics of responsibility. Transcendental Eros

Dialog box · Distance education · Epistemology · Humanities · Pedagogy · Sociology · Transcendental number · Computer Science · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Psychology · Psychology and Mental Health

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access