Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The wisdom of crowds design for sensitive survey questions

Bibliographic Data

ID4170164
AuthorsRoni Lehrer (0000-0002-9202-9278, University of Mannheim, corresponding author), Sebastian Juhl (0000-0002-7123-5398, University of Mannheim), Thomas Gschwend (0000-0002-8656-9622, University of Mannheim)
Year2019
Volume57
Pages99-109
Publication date2019-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueElectoral Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0261-3794 • E-ISSN: 1873-6890
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.electstud.2018.09.012
OpenAlexW2893351557
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited50

Anonymity · Computer security · Crowds · Political science · Public relations · Social desirability · Social desirability bias · Toolbox · Turnout · Voting · Work (physics · Computer Science · Engineering · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

  • ‘Wisdom of The Crowds’ And Their Knowledge Of Puerto Rico’s Challenges Six Months After Hurricane Maria

    Open Access•Carlos L Yordán•Zer - Revista de Estudios de…•2022

  • Introducing a Wisdom of the Crowd’s Process Model for Achieving Effective Crowd Performance

    Open Access•Ji Yu, Ali Intezari Harsini et al.•Group Decision and Negotiation•2026

  • An election forecasting model for subnational elections

    Open Access•Lukas F Stoetzer, Cornelius Erfort et al.•Electoral Studies•2025

  • Where to place sensitive questions? Experiments on survey response order and measures of discriminatory attitudes

    Open Access•Amanda Sahar D’urso, Tabitha Bonilla et al.•Political Science Research and…•2025

  • A Bias-Corrected Estimator for the Crosswise Model with Inattentive Respondents

    Open Access•Yuki Atsusaka, Randolph T Stevenson•Political Analysis•2023

  • The Advent of Survey Experiments in Politics and International Relations

    Open Access•Kathrin Thomas•Government and Opposition•2024

  • Citizen Forecasting

    Open Access•Yannick Dufresne, Bruno Jerôme et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2022

  • Citizen Forecasts of the 2021 German Election

    Open Access•Andreas Erwin Murr, Michael S Lewis-Beck•PS Political Science & Politics•2022

  • Group Size and Protest Mobilization across Movements and Countermovements

    Open Access•Anselm Hager, Lukas Hensel et al.•American Political Science Review•2022

  • A Meta-analysis of Studies on the Performance of the Crosswise Model

    Open Access•Rainer Schnell, Kathrin Thomas•Sociological Methods & Research•2023

  • The Item Count Technique as a Method of Indirect Questioning

    Open Access•Judith Droitcour, Rachel Caspar et al.•Wiley Series in Probability and…•2004

  • Vox Populi

    Open Access•Francis Galton•Nature•1907

  • A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.

    Douglas P Crowne, David Marlowe•Journal of Consulting Psychology•1960

  • The Handbook of Political Behavior

    Open Access•Samuel Long, Samuel L Long•Handbook of Political Behavior•1981

  • The Psychology of Survey Response

    Open Access•Roger Tourangeau, Lance J Rips et al.•Psychology of Survey Response•2000

  • Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys

    Open Access•Jon A Krosnick•Applied Cognitive Psychology•1991

  • Confidentiality Assurances and Response

    Eleanor Singer, Dawn R Von Thurn et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1995

  • Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism

    Open Access•Ronald Inglehart, P Norris•SSRN Electronic Journal•2016

  • Estimating Sensitive Behavior

    Open Access•Kathrin Thomas, David Johann et al.•International Journal of Public…•2016

  • Confidentiality Assurances in Surveys

    Eleanor Singer, Hans‐Jürgen Hippler et al.•International Journal of Public…•1992

  • Does the Recruitment of Offline Households Increase the Sample Representativeness of Probability-Based Online Panels? Evidence From the German Internet Panel

    Open Access•Annelies G Blom, Jessica M E Herzing et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2016

  • Making Use of “Benford’s Law” for the Randomized Response Technique

    Open Access•A Diekmann•Sociological Methods & Research•2012

  • Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys

    Open Access•Elisabeth Coutts, Ben Jann•Sociological Methods & Research•2011

  • Estimating the prevalence of xenophobia and anti-Semitism in Germany

    Open Access•Ivar Krumpal•Social Science Research•2012

  • Uncovering a Blind Spot in Sensitive Question Research

    Open Access•Marc Höglinger, A Diekmann•Political Analysis•2017

  • Measuring Voter Turnout By Using The Randomized Response Technique

    Allyson L Holbrook, Jon A Krosnick•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Crosswise Model

    Ben Jann, Julia Jerke et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports

    Allyson L Holbrook, Jon A Krosnick•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • Accuracy of Vote Expectation Surveys in Forecasting Elections

    Andreas Graefe•Public Opinion Quarterly•2014

  • What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum

    Adam N Glynn, Adam Glynn•Public Opinion Quarterly•2013

  • Social Desirability Bias in Cati, IVR, and Web Surveys

    Frauke Kreuter, Stanley Presser et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • Comparing Oral Interviewing with Self-Administered Computerized QuestionnairesAn Experiment

    Liu Chang, Jon A Krosnick•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • Social Desirability Effects and Support for a Female American President

    Matthew J Streb, Barbara Burrell et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • Forecasting Elections in Multiparty Systems

    Open Access•Lukas F Stoetzer, Marcel Neunhoeffer et al.•Political Analysis•2019

  • The ‘Alternative für Deutschland in the Electorate

    Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger Schmitt‐beck•German Politics•2017

  • The AfD and its Sympathisers

    Nicole Berbuir, Marcel Lewandowsky et al.•German Politics•2015

  • An Empirical Validation Study of Popular Survey Methodologies for Sensitive Questions

    Open Access•Bryn Rosenfeld, Katsushi Imai et al.•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Racial Prejudice and Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action

    James H Kuklinski, Paul M Sniderman et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Citizen Forecasting

    Open Access•Michael S Lewis-Beck, Andrew Skalaban•British Journal of Political…•1989

  • Where diversity comes from and why it matters

    Open Access•Sarah E Page, Scott E Page•European Journal of Social…•2014

  • Survey Research

    Jon A Krosnick•Annual Review of Psychology•1999

  • Sensitive questions in surveys

    Roger Tourangeau, Ting Yan•Psychological Bulletin•2007

  • The wisdom of crowds

    Open Access•Andreas Erwin Murr•Electoral Studies•2016

  • "Wisdom of crowds"? A decentralised election forecasting model that uses citizens' local expectations

    Open Access•Andreas Erwin Murr•Electoral Studies•2011

  • More than wishful thinking

    Open Access•Michael F Meffert, Sascha Huber et al.•Electoral Studies•2011

  • Citizen forecasting

    Open Access•Michael S Lewis-Beck, Mary Stegmaier•Electoral Studies•2011

  • Setting Up an Online Panel Representative of the General Population

    Open Access•Annelies G Blom, Christina Gathmann et al.•CAM•2015

  • Some Effects of 'Social Desirability' in Survey Studies

    Derek L Phillips, Kevin J Clancy•American Journal of Sociology•1972

Unique citing works10
Citations per year2,5
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae