Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Personal involvement and strategies for making contingency judgments

A stake in the dating game makes a difference

Bibliographic Data

ID6201854
AuthorsAllan R Harkne, Allan R Harkness (University of Minnesota, corresponding author), Kenneth G Debono (University of Minnesota), Eugene Borgida (0000-0003-1446-7149, Twin Cities Orthopedics)
Year1985
Volume49
Issue1
Pages22-32
Publication date1985-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037//0022-3514.49.1.22
OpenAlexW4235659188
LanguageEN
Citations received43
References cited16

To examine the relation between degree of involvement in a task and the complexity of strategy a subject applies to the task, we randomly assigned 48 female university volunteers to either a dating condition (high-involvement) or one of two (low-involvement) control conditions. These subjects performed a covariation judgment task for which the likelihood of their using simple or complex strategies was calculated. High-involvement subjects used more complex strategies and tended to be more accurate. These data are discussed in terms of the functionality of human information processing, heuristic analyses of inference strategies, and the importance of considering level of personal involvement in analyses of task performance

Cognitive psychology · Contingency · Epistemology · Social approval · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychology · Psychology of Social Influence · Social Psychology

  • Matters of mind

    Open Access•Ellen J Langer•Consciousness and Cognition•1992

  • The role of self-esteem and anxiety in decision making for self versus others in relationships

    Open Access•Laura Wray-Lake, Laura D Wray et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2005

  • Judgment of Covariation

    Open Access•André Mata•Psicologia•2016

  • Costs and benefits of judgment errors

    Hal R Arkes•Psychological Bulletin•1991

  • The case for motivated reasoning

    Ziva Kunda•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Personal involvement, task complexity, and the decision making process

    Kazuhisa Takemura•Japanese Psychological Research•1994

  • Attitudes and Attitude Change

    S Chaiken, Charles Stangor•Annual Review of Psychology•1987

  • Self-Regulation of Cognitive Inference and Decision Processes

    Open Access•Roy F Baumeister, Leonard S Newman•Personality and Social Psychology…•1994

  • The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes

    David O Sears, Carolyn L Funk•Advances in Experimental Social…•1991

  • Do Election Pledges Matter? The Effects of Broken and Kept Election Pledges on Citizens’ Trust in Government

    Open Access•Evelyn Bytzek, Julia Dupont et al.•Politische Vierteljahresschrift.…•2024

  • Association of Need for Cognition With Judgments of Height, Weight, and Body Fat Covariation

    Phillip L Pryor, Joseph R McGahan et al.•Psychological Reports•2000

  • A debiasing intervention to reduce the causality bias in undergraduates

    Open Access•Naroa Martínez, J Rodríguez‐ferreiro et al.•Current Psychology•2023

  • Know Thy Outgroup

    Open Access•Chadly Stern, Tali Kleiman•Social Psychological and…•2015

  • Ducking the collection of costly evidence

    Open Access•Rasyid Bo Sanitioso, Rasyid Sanitioso et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1991

  • Dimensions and validation of the print perceived message sensation value scale (PPMSV)

    Open Access•Donald W Helme, Lisanne F Grant et al.•The Social Science Journal•2019

  • A levels of processing interpretation of dual-system theories of judgment and decision making

    Open Access•Hal R Arkes•Theory & Psychology•2016

  • The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion

    Richard E Petty, John T Cacioppo•Communication and Persuasion•1986

  • A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes

    Susan T Fiske, Steven L Neuberg•Advances in Experimental Social…•1990

  • The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion

    Richard E Petty, John T Cacioppo•1986

  • Minding Matters

    Ellen J Langer•Advances in Experimental Social…•1989

  • The truth and bias model of judgment

    Tessa V West, D A Kenny•Psychological Review•2011

  • Problem solving in judgment under uncertainty

    Zvi Ginossar, Yaacov Trope•Journal of Personality and Social…•1987

  • Explanations for visual cue primacy in judgments of honesty and deceit

    James B Stiff, Gerald R Miller et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1989

  • Expert psychological testimony in rape trials

    Nancy Brekke, Eugene Borgida•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  • Investigating the social-adjustive and value-expressive functions of attitudes

    Kenneth G Debono•Journal of Personality and Social…•1987

  • Processing of persuasive in-group messages

    Diane M Mackie, Leila T Worth et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1990

  • The preoccupational hazards of social life

    Randall E Osborne, Daniel T Gilber•Journal of Personality and Social…•1992

  • The prejudiced personality revisited

    Mark Schaller, Carrie Boyd et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995

  • The effect of motivation of judgment depends on the difficulty of the judgment

    Brett W Pelham, Efrat Neter•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995

  • How Irrelevant Influences Bias Belief

    Open Access•Yuval Avnur, Dion Scott‐Kakures•Philosophical Perspectives•2015

  • Framing Effects under Different Uses of Performance Information

    Open Access•Paolo Belardinelli, Nicky Belle et al.•Public Administration Review•2018

  • At “Permanent Risk”

    Open Access•Dion Scott‐Kakures•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2002

  • On the Road

    Open Access•Susan T Fiske•Journal of Social Issues•1987

  • Affect in computer-mediated and face-to-face work groups

    Open Access•Jonathan A Rhoades, Kathleen M O’connor et al.•Computer Supported Cooperative…•1996

  • Some factors influencing the effect of depressed mood on anger and overt hostility toward another

    Open Access•Rona Finman, Leonard Berkowitz•Journal of Research in Personality•1989

  • Integrative Complexity in Reasoning About the Persian Gulf War and the Accountability to Skeptical Audience Hypothesis

    Open Access•David R Mandel, Lawrence J Axelrod et al.•Journal of Social Issues•1993

  • Guess who might be coming to dinner

    Open Access•Allen M Omoto, Eugene Borgida•Journal of Experimental Social…•1988

  • Increasing consensus in trait judgments through outcome dependency

    Open Access•Cheryl Flink, B Park•Journal of Experimental Social…•1991

  • Motivation and cognition

    Open Access•Thane S Pittman, Paul R D'Agostino et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1989

  • Putting cognitive psychology to work

    Open Access•Abraham P Schwab, Abraham Schwab•Social Science & Medicine•2008

  • The Big Lie

    Open Access•David Lynn Painter, Juliana Fernandes•American Behavioral Scientist•2024

  • Attitudinal Identification, Stimulus Complexity and Retrospective Duration Estimation

    Open Access•Dan Zakay, Jacob Lomranz•Time & Society•1993

  • Recommendation or Evaluation? Task Sensitivity in Information Source Selection

    Andrew D Gershoff, Susan M Broniarczyk et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2001

  • Human inference

    Richard E Nisbett•Human inference•1980

  • Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences

    Roger E Kirk, Roger Kirk•Experimental Design•2013

  • Handbook of Social Psychology

    Daniel Todd Gilbert, Gardner Lindzey et al.•Handbook of Social Psychology•2012

  • Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations.

    Loren J Chapman, Jean P Chapman•Journal of Abnormal Psychology•1967

  • Assessment of covariation by humans and animals

    Lauren B Alloy, Naomi Tabachnik•Psychological Review•1984

  • Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes.

    Herbert M Jenkins, William C Ward•The Psychological Monographs•1965

  • Judgment under Uncertainty

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Utility, Probability, and Human…•1975

  • On the psychology of prediction.

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Psychological Review•1973

  • The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Science•1981

  • Handbook of Social Cognition

    Robert S Wyer, Robert S Wyer Jr et al.•Handbook of Social Cognition :…•2014

  • Judgment of covariation by social perceivers

    Jennifer Crocker•Psychological Bulletin•1981

  • Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information

    Ralph Erber, Susan T Fiske•Journal of Personality and Social…•1984

  • Outcome dependency

    Ellen Berscheid, William Graziano et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1976

  • Personal involvement and the robustness of perceptual salience effects

    Eugene Borgida, Beth Howard-Pitney•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

  • Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion

    Richard E Petty, John T Cacioppo et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1981

  • Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion

    Shelly Chaiken•Journal of Personality and Social…•1980

Unique citing works43
Citations per year1,07
Citation span1986 - 2024 (39)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 37

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae