Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for a Majority Winner in n-Dimensional Spatial Voting Games

An Intuitive Geometric Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID6230080
AuthorsL Feld (0000-0003-4820-1365), Scott L Feld, B Grofman (0000-0002-2801-3351)
Year1987
Volume31
Issue4
Pages709
Publication date1987-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2111221
OpenAlexW2317678631
LanguageEN
Citations received23
References cited15

Necessary and sufficient conditions for there to be a majority winner in n-dimensional spatial voting games are well known, but they are customarily stated in symbolic terms in a fashion which is virtually incomprehensible to those without some reasonable degree of mathematical training, and the proofs of the basic results are even less accessible to the nonmathematically sophisticated reader. We offer proofs of the key results in this area restricted to the important case where voter preferences are a simple function of distance, that is, where, in a choice between any two alternatives, voters prefer the alternative that is closer to their ideal outcome. Our proofs, unlike those customary in the literature, can be understood by anyone who can remember high school geometry. The nature of our proofs is such as to show how the basic n-dimensional results, including the Plott (1967) conditions, the Kramer (1973) sequential voting theorem, the McKelvey (1976, 1979) agenda manipulation result, the Shepsle (1979) germaneness restriction result, and the McCubbins and Schwartz (1985) budget constraint result, can all be derived as reasonably straightforward extensions of Duncan Black's famous median voter result in the one-dimensional case

Constraint (computer-aided design · Epistemology · Function (biology · Geometry · Ideal (ethics · Mathematical economics · Mathematical proof · Outcome (game theory · Political science · Simple (philosophy · Voting · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Mathematics

  • The Future of Analytical Politics

    Melvin J Hinich•The Oxford handbook of political…•2009

  • On the approximability of the yolk by the LP yolk in the spatial model of voting

    Open Access•Ran Hu, James P Bailey•Social Choice and Welfare•2026

  • Simulation

    Open Access•Richard J Timpone, Charles S Taber•Social Science Computer Review•1998

  • Stable outcomes in spatial voting games

    Open Access•Guillermo Owens, Guillermo Owen•Mathematical Social Sciences•1990

  • Why representatives are ideologists though voters are not

    Open Access•Amihai Glazer, B Grofman•Public Choice•1989

  • On the empirical relevance of Condorcet’s paradox

    Open Access•Adrian Van Deemen•Public Choice•2014

  • Centripetal forces in spatial voting

    Open Access•L Feld, Scott L Feld et al.•Public Choice•1988

  • Logical Deficiencies in Spatial Models

    Open Access•Jeffrey Milyo•Public Choice•2000

  • Majority rule outcomes and the structure of debate in one-issue-at-a-time decision-making

    Open Access•L Feld, Scott L Feld et al.•Public Choice•1988

  • Towards a theory of bicameralism

    Open Access•B Grofman, Thomas L Brunell et al.•Public Choice•2012

  • The half-win set and the geometry of spatial voting games

    Open Access•L Feld, Scott L Feld et al.•Public Choice•1991

  • Pure-strategy Nash equilibrium in the spatial model with valence

    Open Access•Martin Mathieu, Mathieu Martin et al.•Public Choice•2022

  • Valence characteristics, costly policy and the median-crossing property

    Open Access•Donald Wittman•Public Choice•2005

  • The Policy Opportunities in Presidential Honeymoons

    Open Access•Matthew N Beckmann, Joseph Godfrey et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • The Geometry of Majority Rule

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller, B Grofman et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1989

  • Rethinking Duverger's Law

    Open Access•Rein Taagepera, B Grofman•European Journal of Political…•1985

  • Centre parties and coalition cabinet formations

    Open Access•Peter Van Roozendaal•European Journal of Political…•1990

  • Finagle's Law and the Finagle Point, a New Solution Concept for Two-Candidate Competition in Spatial Voting Games Without a Core

    A Wuffle, L Feld et al.•American Journal of Political…•1989

  • Populism, Heresthetics and Political Stability

    Open Access•Jack H Nagel•British Journal of Political…•1993

  • "Volonté Generale" and the Instability of Spatial Voting Games

    Open Access•Ole-Jørgen Skog, Ole‐jørgen Skog•Rationality and Society•1994

  • The Core and the Stability of Group Choice in Spatial Voting Games

    Open Access•Norman Schofield, B Grofman et al.•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Sequential Voting with Endogenous Voter Forecasts

    Open Access•Dennis Epple, Joseph B Kadane•American Political Science Review•1990

  • The Voting Paradox in Socially Integrated Populations

    Open Access•Ole-Jørgen Skog, Ole‐jørgen Skog•Acta Sociologica•1993

  • Generalized Symmetry Conditions at a Core Point

    Richard D Mckelvey, Norman Schofield•Econometrica•1987

  • Social Preference Orderings and Majority Rule

    Otto A Davis, Morris H Degroot et al.•Econometrica•1972

  • The Theory of Committees and Elections

    Open Access•Duncan Black, Georg Kunze•Theory of Committees and Elections•1986

  • On Plott's pairwise symmetry condition for majority rule equilibrium

    Open Access•James M Enelow, Melvin J Hinisch•Public Choice•1983

  • Existence of a ?structurally stable? equilibrium for a non-collegial voting rule

    Open Access•Norman Schofield•Public Choice•1986

  • Majority rule outcomes and the structure of debate in one-issue-at-a-time decision-making

    Open Access•L Feld, Scott L Feld et al.•Public Choice•1988

  • Structure-induced equilibrium and legislative choice

    Open Access•Kenneth A Shepsle, Barry R Weingast•Public Choice•1981

  • On division of the question

    Open Access•Joseph B Kadane•Public Choice•1972

  • The politics of flatland

    Open Access•Mathew D Mccubbins, Thomas Schwartz•Public Choice•1985

  • On the Rationale of Group Decision-making

    Duncan Black•Journal of Political Economy•1948

  • Sophisticated voting over multidimensional choice spaces

    Gerald H Kramer•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1972

  • A New Solution Set for Tournaments and Majority Voting

    Nicholas R Miller•American Journal of Political…•1980

  • Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models

    Kenneth A Shepsle•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • Decision Rules and Policy Outcomes

    Open Access•Douglas Rae, Douglas W Rae et al.•British Journal of Political…•1971

  • The Core and the Stability of Group Choice in Spatial Voting Games

    Open Access•Norman Schofield, B Grofman et al.•American Political Science Review•1988

Unique citing works23
Citations per year0,56
Citation span1985 - 2026 (42)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 23

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae