Reasons as defaults
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6547625 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John F Horty (0000-0001-5689-1824, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Pages | 256 |
| Publication date | 2012-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Reasons as defaults (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744077.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W2157503655 |
| ISBN | 9780199744077 |
| Open Library | OL24885779M |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 67 |
| References cited | 2 |
"Although the study of reasons plays an important role in both epistemology and moral philosophy, little attention has been devoted to the question of how, exactly, reasons interact to support the actions or conclusions they do. In this book, John F. Horty attempts to answer this question by providing a precise, concrete account of reasons and their interaction, based on the logic of default reasoning. The book begins with an intuitive, accessible introduction to default logic itself, and then argues that this logic can be adapted to serve as a foundation for a concrete theory of reasons. Horty then shows that the resulting theory helps to explain how the interplay among reasons can determine what we ought to do by developing two different deontic logics, capturing two different intuitions about moral conflicts. In the central part of the book, Horty elaborates the basic theory to account for reasoning about the strength of our own reasons, and also about the related concepts of undercutting defeaters and exclusionary reasons. The theory is illustrated with an application to particularist arguments concerning the role of principles in moral theory. The book concludes by introducing a pair of issues new to the philosophical literature: the problem of determining the epistemic status of conclusions supported by separate but conflicting reasons, and the problem of drawing conclusions from sets of reasons that can vary arbitrarily in strength, or importance."--Publisher's website.
Default · default reasoning · Economics · Explanation · Justification (Theory of knowledge · normative reasoning · Rationalism · Reason · Reasoning · reasons for action · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Finance · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Justification · Justification (Theory of knowledge)
Normative metaphysics for accountants
Reasons as Premises of Good Reasoning
Toward a Reasons-First View of Normative Background Conditions
Dr Livingstone, I Presume
Normative Inference Tickets
Deliberation, Reasons, and Alternatives
Problems and solutions for a hybrid approach to grounding practical normativity
Nudges, Nudging, and Self-Guidance Under the Influence
A Holist Balance Scale
Moral Principles as Generics
Is reasoning responding to reasons
The Content and Logic of Imperatives
Subtracting Reasons in Normative Domains
A Case for a Reasons-Based Theory of Argument
Epistemic Conflicts and the Form of Epistemic Rules
Reasoning with reasons
A dilemma for reasons additivity
When are Customer Boycotts Permissible
A semantics of face emoji in discourse
Anankastic conditionals and the default theory of reasons
The Normative Autonomy of Logic
Belief
Provisional Universality
How to be reasonable about the meaning of ‘ought’
How to modify the strength of a reason
What the doctor should do
Reply to Reasons Latesters
Semantic reasons
Logical norms as defeasible obligations
Perspectivism, Accessibility and the Failure of Conjunction Agglomeration
Normative Resilience
Moral Rationalism and Demandingness in Kant
Commitments continued
Logic, Reasoning and Revision
Pass the Buck to Reasons for What? On How to Characterise the Response Component of the Buck‐Passing Analysis of Value
Obligations and Permissions, and Conflicting Norms
The balance and weight of reasons
Target-Centered Virtue Ethics
From Responsibility to Reason-Giving Explainable Artificial Intelligence
In Defense of Moderation
Can There Be Government House Reasons for Action
Coverage Shortfalls at the Library of Agency
Beyond Ought-Implies-Can
Rights, Roles, and Interests
Replies to Schafer, Schroeder, and Staffel
Requirements, Oughts, Intentions
Exceptions in Nonderivative Value
The Reasoning View and Defeasible Practical Reasoning
What is Good Reasoning
New foundations for imperative logic III
The Little Nell Problem
Salience reasoning in coordination games
Free choice reasons
Believing in default rules
Defeasible normative reasoning
A conditional logic for abduction
Goodness, availability, and argument structure
Practical reasons, theoretical reasons, and permissive and prohibitive balancing
Conciliatory views, higher-order disagreements, and defeasible logic
Good reasons are apparent to the knowing subject
Epistemic justification
Embeddedness and the psychological nature of default reason
Outline of a Theory of Reasons
Self-Effacing Reasons and Epistemic Constraints
Morality, Uncertainty
In search of lost principles
Reasons and Defeasible Reasoning
| Citations per year | 5.58 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |