Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reasons as defaults

Bibliographic Data

ID6547625
AuthorsJohn F Horty (0000-0001-5689-1824, corresponding author)
Year2012
Pages256
Publication date2012-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueReasons as defaults (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744077.001.0001
OpenAlexW2157503655
ISBN9780199744077
Open LibraryOL24885779M
LanguageEN
Citations received67
References cited2

"Although the study of reasons plays an important role in both epistemology and moral philosophy, little attention has been devoted to the question of how, exactly, reasons interact to support the actions or conclusions they do. In this book, John F. Horty attempts to answer this question by providing a precise, concrete account of reasons and their interaction, based on the logic of default reasoning. The book begins with an intuitive, accessible introduction to default logic itself, and then argues that this logic can be adapted to serve as a foundation for a concrete theory of reasons. Horty then shows that the resulting theory helps to explain how the interplay among reasons can determine what we ought to do by developing two different deontic logics, capturing two different intuitions about moral conflicts. In the central part of the book, Horty elaborates the basic theory to account for reasoning about the strength of our own reasons, and also about the related concepts of undercutting defeaters and exclusionary reasons. The theory is illustrated with an application to particularist arguments concerning the role of principles in moral theory. The book concludes by introducing a pair of issues new to the philosophical literature: the problem of determining the epistemic status of conclusions supported by separate but conflicting reasons, and the problem of drawing conclusions from sets of reasons that can vary arbitrarily in strength, or importance."--Publisher's website.

Default · default reasoning · Economics · Explanation · Justification (Theory of knowledge · normative reasoning · Rationalism · Reason · Reasoning · reasons for action · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Finance · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Justification · Justification (Theory of knowledge)

  • Normative metaphysics for accountants

    Open Access•Barry Maguire, Justin Snedegar•Philosophical Studies•2020

  • Reasons as Premises of Good Reasoning

    Open Access•Jonathan Way•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2017

  • Toward a Reasons-First View of Normative Background Conditions

    Open Access•Andrés G Garcia, Jakob Green Werkmäster•philoSOPHIA•2019

  • Dr Livingstone, I Presume

    Open Access•Peyton Engel, Pascal Engel•EPISTÉMÈ•2021

  • Normative Inference Tickets

    Open Access•Jen Foster, Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa•EPISTÉMÈ•2023

  • Deliberation, Reasons, and Alternatives

    Open Access•Justin Snedegar•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2018

  • Problems and solutions for a hybrid approach to grounding practical normativity

    Open Access•Jeff Behrends•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2015

  • Nudges, Nudging, and Self-Guidance Under the Influence

    Open Access•W Jared Parmer•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2023

  • A Holist Balance Scale

    Open Access•Chris Tucker•Journal of the American…•2023

  • Moral Principles as Generics

    Open Access•RAVI THAKRAL•Journal of the American…•2024

  • Is reasoning responding to reasons

    Franziska Poprawe•Philosophical Explorations•2020

  • The Content and Logic of Imperatives

    Open Access•NICOLAS FILLION, Matthew Lynn et al.•Axiomathes•2021

  • Subtracting Reasons in Normative Domains

    Open Access•Federico L G Faroldi•International Journal for the…•2024

  • A Case for a Reasons-Based Theory of Argument

    Open Access•Hubert Marraud•Argumentation•2025

  • Epistemic Conflicts and the Form of Epistemic Rules

    Open Access•Aleks Knoks•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2024

  • Reasoning with reasons

    Open Access•Huub Vromen•Economics and Philosophy•2024

  • A dilemma for reasons additivity

    Open Access•Geoff Keeling•Economics and Philosophy•2023

  • When are Customer Boycotts Permissible

    Open Access•Tamsin Donaldson•Journal of Business Ethics•2026

  • A semantics of face emoji in discourse

    Open Access•Patrick Georg Grosz, Gabriel Greenberg et al.•Linguistics and Philosophy•2023

  • Anankastic conditionals and the default theory of reasons

    Fabrizio Cariani

  • The Normative Autonomy of Logic

    Open Access•Diego Tajer•Erkenntnis•2022

  • Belief

    Open Access•John Macfarlane•Erkenntnis•2025

  • Provisional Universality

    Open Access•Daniel Bonevac•Erkenntnis•2024

  • How to be reasonable about the meaning of ‘ought’

    Open Access•Eliot Watkins•Philosophical Studies•2026

  • How to modify the strength of a reason

    Open Access•Andrew Kernohan•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • What the doctor should do

    Open Access•Davide Fassio•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • Reply to Reasons Latesters

    Open Access•Mark Schroeder•Philosophical Studies•2024

  • Semantic reasons

    Susanna Cummings

  • Logical norms as defeasible obligations

    Open Access•Matteo De Benedetto, Alessandra Marra•Inquiry•2024

  • Perspectivism, Accessibility and the Failure of Conjunction Agglomeration

    Davide Fassio•Ethics•2021

  • Normative Resilience

    Open Access•Henrik Andersson, Jakob Green Werkmäster•Utilitas•2022

  • Moral Rationalism and Demandingness in Kant

    Open Access•Marcel Van Ackeren, Martin Sticker•Kantian Review•2018

  • Commitments continued

    Brogan Geurts, Bart Geurts•Theoretical Linguistics•2019

  • Logic, Reasoning and Revision

    Open Access•Patrick Allo•Theoria•2016

  • Pass the Buck to Reasons for What? On How to Characterise the Response Component of the Buck‐Passing Analysis of Value

    Open Access•Marta Johansson Werkmäster, Jakob Green Werkmäster•Theoria•2026

  • Obligations and Permissions, and Conflicting Norms

    Open Access•Andrew Halpin•Theoria•2025

  • The balance and weight of reasons

    Open Access•Nicholas Makins•Theoria•2023

  • Target-Centered Virtue Ethics

    Open Access•N Smith, Nicholas Ryan Smith•Handbuch Tugend und Tugendethik•2021

  • From Responsibility to Reason-Giving Explainable Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Kevin Baum, Susanne Mantel et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2022

  • In Defense of Moderation

    Open Access•James Goodrich, James T Goodrich•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2023

  • Can There Be Government House Reasons for Action

    Open Access•Hille Paakkunainen•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2017

  • Coverage Shortfalls at the Library of Agency

    Open Access•Elijah Millgram•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2023

  • Beyond Ought-Implies-Can

    Open Access•Peter B M Vranas•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2024

  • Rights, Roles, and Interests

    Open Access•Robert Mullins•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2019

  • Replies to Schafer, Schroeder, and Staffel

    Open Access•Errol Lord•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2020

  • Requirements, Oughts, Intentions

    Open Access•John F Horty, John Horty•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2015

  • Exceptions in Nonderivative Value

    Open Access•Garrett Cullity•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

  • The Reasoning View and Defeasible Practical Reasoning

    Open Access•Samuel Asarnow•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

  • What is Good Reasoning

    Open Access•Conor Mchugh, Jonathan Way•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2016

  • New foundations for imperative logic III

    Open Access•Peter B M Vranas•Synthese•2016

  • The Little Nell Problem

    Open Access•Richmond H Thomason•Synthese•2018

  • Salience reasoning in coordination games

    Open Access•Julius Schönherr•Synthese•2021

  • Free choice reasons

    Open Access•Daniel Bonevac•Synthese•2019

  • Believing in default rules

    Open Access•Frederik J Andersen, Rasmus K Rendsvig•Synthese•2025

  • Defeasible normative reasoning

    Open Access•Willfried Spohn•Synthese•2020

  • A conditional logic for abduction

    Open Access•Mathieu Beirlaen, Atocha Aliseda•Synthese•2014

  • Goodness, availability, and argument structure

    Open Access•Anna‐Sara Malmgren, Anna-Sara Malmgren•Synthese•2021

  • Practical reasons, theoretical reasons, and permissive and prohibitive balancing

    Open Access•John Brunero•Synthese•2022

  • Conciliatory views, higher-order disagreements, and defeasible logic

    Open Access•Aleks Knoks•Synthese•2022

  • Good reasons are apparent to the knowing subject

    Open Access•Spencer Paulson•Synthese•2023

  • Epistemic justification

    Open Access•Willfried Spohn•Synthese•2018

  • Embeddedness and the psychological nature of default reason

    Open Access•Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  • Outline of a Theory of Reasons

    Open Access•Vincenzo Crupi, Andrea Iacona•The Philosophical Quarterly•2022

  • Self-Effacing Reasons and Epistemic Constraints

    Open Access•Massimiliano Carrara, Davide Fassio•The Philosophical Quarterly•2024

  • Morality, Uncertainty

    Open Access•Chad Lee-Stronach•The Philosophical Quarterly•2021

  • In search of lost principles

    Open Access•Errol Lord•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • Reasons and Defeasible Reasoning

    Open Access•John Brunero•The Philosophical Quarterly•2021

  • Ethics Without Principles

    Jonathan Dancy•Ethics without principles•2004

Citations per year5.58
Citation span2014 - 2026 (13)
Highly citedNo
Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae