Year One Results From the Multisite Randomized Evaluation of the i3 Scale-Up of Reading Recovery
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8223164 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Henry May (0000-0002-5965-3933, University of Delaware, corresponding author), Abigail Gray (0000-0003-0437-9153, University of Pennsylvania), Philip Sirinides (0000-0002-2259-7034, University of Pennsylvania), Heather Goldsworthy (University of Pennsylvania), Michael Armijo (University of Pennsylvania), Cecile Sam (0000-0002-3949-9940, University of Pennsylvania), Jessica N Gillespie (University of Pennsylvania), Jessica Gillespie (0009-0007-3063-3131, California University of Pennsylvania), Namrata Tognatta (University of Pennsylvania) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 547-581 |
| Publication date | 2015-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Educational Research Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-8312 • E-ISSN: 1935-1011 |
| Publisher | American Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3102/0002831214565788 |
| OpenAlex | W2147961232 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 23 |
Reading Recovery (RR) is a short-term, one-to-one intervention designed to help the lowest achieving readers in first grade. This article presents first-year results from the multisite randomized controlled trial (RCT) and implementation study under the $55 million Investing in Innovation (i3) Scale-Up Project. For the 2011–2012 school year, the estimated standardized effect of RR on students’ Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) Total Reading Scores was .69 standard deviations relative to the population of struggling readers eligible for RR under the i3 scale-up and .47 standard deviations relative to the nationwide population of all first graders. School-level implementation of RR was, in most respects, faithful to the RR Standards and Guidelines, and the intensive training provided to new RR teachers was viewed as critical to successful implementation
Confidence interval · Environmental health · Geography · Intervention (counseling · Mathematics education · Medical education · Political science · Population · Randomized controlled trial · Randomized experiment · Reading (process · Relative risk · Scale (ratio · Statistics · Disability Education and Employment · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development
Effective classroom instructions for primary literacy
Addressing Inadequacies of the Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement
Implementation Challenges for Tier One and Tier Two School-Based Programs for Early Adolescents
Failing to catch up in reading in the middle years
A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Descubriendo la Lectura
Learning to read and write
Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers
Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading
Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes
Preventing Early Reading Failure with One-to-One Tutoring
Commentary
Reading Recovery
An Evaluation of Reading Recovery
Comparing Instructional Models for the Literacy Education of High-Risk First Graders
Introduction to response to intervention
Reading Recovery in the United States
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2020 (5) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |