How people choose between criminal opportunities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9681165 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew T Krajewski (0000-0001-5958-546X, Criminology and Criminal Justice Program, School of Economic, Political, and Policy Sciences University of Texas at Dallas Richardson Texas USA, corresponding author), Justin T Pickett (0000-0002-8519-2659, School of Criminal Justice University at Albany, SUNY Albany USA), Bruce A Jacobs (No affiliation) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 639-660 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Criminology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-1384 • E-ISSN: 1745-9125 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1745-9125.70006 |
| OpenAlex | W4414284684 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 103 |
The explanatory power of criminological theories may differ across decision‐making stages because involvement decisions (the choice to become involved in crime) and event decisions (the choice between criminal opportunities) are theoretically distinct. Although our understanding of offender decision‐making has advanced greatly in recent years, event decisions remain understudied. Rational choice theory (RCT) indicates that crime benefits, arrest risk, sanction severity, opportunity cost, and payout timeliness should drive event decisions. Other scholarship indicates that the presence of co‐offenders and victim type may also matter. To test the causal effects of each of these factors, we conducted a paired‐profile conjoint experiment with a national sample ( N = 1,023), wherein participants collectively evaluated more than 10,000 criminal opportunities. Consistent with RCT, crime benefits, arrest risk, and sanction severity exerted sizable effects on event decisions. Victim type also mattered, such that participants preferred to target wealthy individuals and large corporations. Other factors (e.g., co‐offenders and opportunity cost) had weaker effects. Event decision‐making was mostly similar regardless of participants’ self‐control or past offending. Our experiment suggests that RCT may be especially useful for explaining event decisions, even if other theories provide a stronger account of involvement decisions
Event (particle physics · Explanatory power · Power (physics · Sample (material · Scholarship · Test (biology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Dealing crack
Code of the street
Armed Robbers in Action
Robbing Drug Dealers
Great Pretenders
Dual-Process Models of Criminal Decision Making
Data quality in online human-subjects research
Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis.
Prospect Theory
Are Relational Inferences from Crowdsourced and Opt-in Samples Generalizable? Comparing Criminal Justice Attitudes in the GSS and Five Online Samples
Deterrence
Sanctions, Perceptions, and Crime
Generalizability of heterogeneous treatment effect estimates across samples
Conjoint Survey Experiments
The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment
Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes
A dual systems model of adolescent risk‐taking
Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior
Addressing the ‘Dirty Little Secret’ of Deterrence
Validation of Short-Form Scales of Self-Control, Procedural Justice, and Moral Foundations
Morality, Deterrability, and Offender Decision Making
Status Gains versus Status Losses
Drivers of Data Quality in Advertising Research
Greed Restraint
Moral Salience, Situational Moral Evaluations, and Criminal Choice
How Much Do We Really Know about Criminal Deterrence
The Oxford Handbook of Offender Decision Making
Street Justice
Factorial Survey Experiments
A General Theory of Crime
Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime
Offender Decision-Making in Criminology
Self-Control and Crime
Sanctions, Perceptions, and Crime
Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents
The Generalizability of Survey Experiments
The Generalizability of Online Experiments Conducted During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Accounting for Noncompliance in Survey Experiments
Elaborating the Individual Difference Component in Deterrence Theory
Peers and offender decision‐making
Rational Choice Theory, Crime Control Policy, and Criminological Relevance
Arrested Development
The rich—love them or hate them? Divergent implicit and explicit attitudes toward the wealthy
Burglars on the Job, Streetlife and Residential Break-ins
Situational Crime Prevention
Modeling Offenders' Decisions
What Have We Learned from Five Decades of Neutralization Research
Crime Perceptions in a Natural Setting by Expert and Novice Shoplifters
Assessing the perceived benefits—criminal offending relationship
Crime and Punishment
Incentives for Collective Deviance
Structural predictors of choice
Traits and States
Can the group disincentivize offending? Considering opt‐out thresholds and decision reversals
Using the Correct Statistical Test for the Equality of Regression Coefficients
Toward a Bifurcated Theory of Emotional Deterrence
Deterrence, Criminal Opportunities, and Police
Managing Retaliation
Heuristics and Biases, Rational Choice, and Sanction Perceptions
The Missing Link in General Deterrence Research
On Ambiguity in Perceptions of Risk
A Dual‐systems Approach for Understanding Differential Susceptibility to Processes of Peer Influence
Deterrence and Deterrability
Can Rational Choice Be Considered a General Theory of Crime? Evidence From Individual‐level Panel Data
Sanction risk perceptions, coherence, and deterrence
Perceived arrest risk, psychic rewards, and offense specialization
Generalizing from Survey Experiments Conducted on Mechanical Turk
Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis
Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias
Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered Surveys
Crime, Deterrence, and Rational Choice
Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive
Techniques of Neutralization
Enduring Individual Differences and Rational Choice Theories of Crime
Deterring Delinquents
Sensitive questions in surveys
Beyond Deterrence
Prisoners and their victims
Talk Is Cheap
Logistic Regression
Streetlife and the Rewards of Auto Theft
The past, present, and future of experimental methods in the social sciences
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |