Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Incumbency Effects of Signalling

Bibliographic Data

ID9728142
AuthorsFRANCESCO CASELLI (London School of Economics and Political Science), Tom Cunningham (0000-0002-9550-4353, Harvard University), Massimo Morelli (0000-0002-2405-7410, Columbia University), Inés Moreno de Barreda (University of Oxford)
Year2014
Volume81
Issue323
Pages397-418
Publication date2014-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEconomica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0427 • E-ISSN: 1468-0335
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ecca.12060
OpenAlexW1986429800
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited37

Much literature on political behaviour treats politicians as motivated by re‐election, choosing actions to signal their types to voters. We identify a novel implication of incumbent signalling. Because incumbents only care about clearing a re‐election hurdle, signals will tend to cluster just above the threshold needed for re‐election. This generates a skew distribution of signals leading to an incumbency advantage in the probability of election. We also solve for the optimal threshold when voters have the ability to commit

Commit · Distribution (mathematics) · Economics · Microeconomics · Monetary economics · Political science · Politics · SIGNAL (programming language) · Signalling · Skew · Telecommunications · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Mathematics · Media Influence and Politics · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies

  • Preventing leaders' autocratic entrenchment by exponential super-majority threshold escalators

    Open Access•Reuven Shapira•Frontiers in Political Science•2023

  • Reputation Effects and Incumbency (Dis)Advantage

    Navin Kartik, Richard Van Weelden•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2019

  • To fight or to govern? Political capital and electoral competition

    Open Access•Catherine Hafer, Scott A Tyson et al.•American Journal of Political…•2026

  • Quality-Based Explanations of Incumbency Effects

    Andrew C Eggers•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • What makes politicians work harder? The role of electoral advantage

    Open Access•Jarosław Bełdowski, Łukasz Dąbroś et al.•Journal of Legislative Studies•2024

  • The Voters' Curses

    Open Access•Carlo Prato, Stephane Wolton•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Unlikely Democrats

    Open Access•Michael Albertus, Victor Gay•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • The Personal Vote

    Bruce E Cain, Bruce Cain et al.•Personal Vote•1987

  • Good News and Bad News

    Paul Milgrom, Paul R Milgrom•The Bell Journal of Economics•1981

  • Bayesian Persuasion

    Emir Kamenica, Matthew Gentzkow•American Economic Review•2011

  • Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles

    Kenneth Rogoff, Anne Sibert•The Review of Economic Studies•1988

  • The Politician and the Judge

    Eric Maskin, Jean Tirole•American Economic Review•2004

  • Elections with platform and valence competition

    Open Access•Scott Ashworth, Ethan Bueno De Mesquita•Games and Economic Behavior•2009

  • Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections

    Open Access•David S Lee•Journal of Econometrics•2008

  • Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability

    Timothy Besley, Andrea Prat•American Economic Review•2006

  • Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate

    Open Access•Enriqueta Aragones, Thomas R Palfrey•Journal of Economic Theory•2002

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • Valence Politics and Equilibrium in Spatial Election Models

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•Public Choice•2000

  • Covering Campaigns

    Open Access•Scott Keeter•Political Science Quarterly•1983

  • Press Coverage and Political Accountability

    Jane Mcintosh Snyder, David Stromberg•Journal of Political Economy•2010

  • The Personal Vote

    Open Access•William H Flanigan•Political Science Quarterly•1988

  • Senate Elections in the News

    Open Access•Kim Fridkin Kahn•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1991

  • The rise and fall of spin

    Open Access•Kevin Moloney•Journal of Public Affairs•2001

  • The Incumbent in the Living Room

    Markus Prior•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U. S. House

    Open Access•Steven D Levitt, Catherine D Wolfram et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1997

  • Electoral Selection, Strategic Challenger Entry, and the Incumbency Advantage

    Scott Ashworth, Ethan Bueno De Mesquita•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Electoral Contests, Incumbency Advantages, and Campaign Finance

    Adam Meirowitz•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Ideology and information in policymaking

    Open Access•Massimo Morelli, Richard Van Weelden•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2013

  • Leadership and Pandering

    Brandice Canes-Wrone, Michael C Herron et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias

    Andrew Gelman, Gary King•American Journal of Political…•1990

  • Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote

    Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Challenger Entry and Voter Learning

    Open Access•Sanford C Gordon, Gregory A Huber et al.•American Political Science Review•2007

  • Convicting the Innocent

    Open Access•Timothy Feddersen, Wolfgang Pesendorfer•American Political Science Review•1998

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,7
Citation span2016 - 2026 (11)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae