What now? Defining capricious supervision and examining its impact on employee strain
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9891371 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Soojung Han (0009-0002-7160-017X), su jeong Han (0000-0001-7915-9687, University of St. Thomas, USA,, corresponding author), Hyesoo Park (Governors State University, corresponding author), Joseph Kim (0000-0002-5521-8213, University of Illinois Chicago, corresponding author), Joseph K Kim (0000-0003-3348-2459, University of Illinois Chicago), Kyle J Emich (0000-0003-4199-4630, University of Delaware, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-09 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Relations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-7267 • E-ISSN: 1741-282X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00187267251379398 |
| OpenAlex | W4415043937 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 72 |
Despite frequent anecdotal accounts and media portrayals of unpredictable and/or inconsistent leaders, scholarly understanding of such leadership remains limited, mostly due to ambiguity surrounding its conceptualization and operationalization. Rather than focusing on employees’ direct experiences with unpredictable and inconsistent leaders, prior research has primarily measured changes in specific leader behavior over time or the interactive effects of seemingly opposing leader behaviors. Yet, this is not the same as perceiving that a leader has a consistently erratic style. Here, we conceptualize and systematically operationalize capricious supervision , defined as an employee’s perception of their leader’s frequent changes in decisions and treatment toward them. Across three studies with five employee samples, we develop a scale of capricious supervision (Study 1) and establish its discriminant and predictive validity by differentiating it from abusive supervision, justice variability (Study 2), and ambivalent leadership (Study 3) and examining its impact on employee outcomes (Study 3). Grounded in the stressor-strain model, we find that employees experiencing capricious supervision perceive their work as uncertain and frustrating, leading to emotional exhaustion, poor sleep quality, and counterproductive work behavior. Together, we provide a clear understanding of capricious supervision as a distinct leadership style, opening a conversation on its role in the workplace
Abusive supervision · Ambiguity · Ambivalence · Conceptualization · Conversation · Counterproductive work behavior · Injustice · Operationalization · Organizational justice · Perception · Scale (ratio · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Psychology of Social Influence · Workplace Violence and Bullying
Giving in to Feel Good
Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB) in Response to Job Stressors and Organizational Justice
Job stressors, emotional exhaustion, and need for recovery
The Emotion Process
Ambivalence in Organizations
A Note on the Multiplying Factors for Various χ2 Approximations
Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance
Explaining the justice–performance relationship
The Application of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Applied Psychology
Is Consistently Unfair Better than Sporadically Fair? An Investigation of Justice Variability and Stress
Leadership Styles
Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management
Retaliation in the workplace
When fairness works
Content validation guidelines
Stress, appraisal, and coping
On the dimensionality of organizational justice
An Index of Factorial Simplicity
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Human Aggression
A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires
When Your Leader Just Does Not Make Any Sense
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
Jekyll and Hyde Leadership
The power of reflection for would‐be leaders
Profiles of attribution for work–family conflict episodes and their relation to negative emotions
Recovery from job stress
Why inconsistent leadership is regarded as procedurally unfair
Ambivalence and decisional conflict as a cause of psychological discomfort
Social relationships and intraindividual variability in interpersonal behavior
The measurement of experienced burnout
Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency
Ego depletion
How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism
A Dependency Model of Mass-Media Effects
Putting Work to Bed
| Highly cited | No |
|---|