Clearing the fog for an overall view on state-owned enterprises
Quality of aggregate holdings reporting by public administrations in 12 countries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9963802 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ulf Papenfuß (0000-0002-1326-7391, Zeppelin Universität gemeinnützige GmbH, corresponding author), Lars Steinhauer (Leipzig University), Benjamin Friedlander (0000-0002-9496-5764, Leipzig University) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 116-136 |
| Publication date | 2017-02-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0020852316681445 |
| OpenAlex | W2588018273 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 29 |
In the context of current debates on sustainable public service provision, austerity, debts and cutback management, the governance and management of and in state-owned enterprises is a crucial issue. An aggregate holdings report is an important tool for public administrations to provide accountability and the necessary overall view on the institutional service provision structures of core administration and state-owned enterprises. On the basis of a developed quality index with 175 test criteria, this study analyses the diffusion of aggregate holdings reports in 17 countries and the quality of 12 existing reports at the national level. First, the study provides a conceptual contribution for assessing aggregate holdings reports and future research on the issues of the model categories. Second, for an empirical contribution, the analysis enhances our state of knowledge on aggregate holdings report diffusion and quality patterns. Findings show that, in many cases, public administrations do not meet the requirements from theory and practice. Newer Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and European Union members reach comparably higher quality scores. This comparative study offers new insights that can enhance the sustainable public management and control of state-owned enterprises. Points for practitioners The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises, which were published after an intensive consultation process in 2005 and revised in 2015, demand public authorities to develop aggregate holdings reports that cover all SOEs, and make them a key disclosure tool directed to the general public and politicians. This study develops a quality model for assessing the quality of aggregate holdings reports. The model can also answer questions that are often raised in reform debates, such as ‘Which is the best aggregate holdings report?’ or ‘Which aggregate holdings report can I use as a reference to further develop my own aggregate holdings report?’. The model is a conceptual contribution and the empirical results can be used for international bench-learning. They are also useful for international organisations such as the European Union, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Bank, International Monetary Fund, Chartered Institute of Public Finance & Accounting and development aid/cooperation agencies in each country. The results of this study indicate that policymakers at the national and international levels should give more emphasis to the diffusion and quality of aggregate holdings reports and should reflect on establishing and revising legal obligations for aggregate holdings reports because the recommendations of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development guidelines, as a soft-law approach, are often not put into practice
Accountability · Austerity · Business · Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Economics · Economy · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Public sector · Public service · Quality (philosophy · Accounting · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting · Finance · Public Administration · Public Procurement and Policy · Public-Private Partnership Projects
The Research Philosophies, Values, and Principles of Ontology, Epistemology, And Axiology in A State-Owned Holding Company
Does performance-related pay and public service motivation research treat state-owned enterprises like a neglected Cinderella? A systematic literature review and agenda for future research on performance effects
In control we trust!? Exploring formal control configurations for municipally owned corporations
Role and Performance of Public Enterprises
Hybrid coordination of city organisations
Strategic corporate governance factors for municipally owned companies
Mind the board!’
An extension of exemptions
Understanding self‐regulation for political control and policymaking
Government Agencies
State-owned Enterprises Around the WORLD as Hybrid Organizations
Accountability in the Shadow of Hierarchy
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation
What to do when Stakeholders matter
Comparing Agencies across Countries
The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields
Analysing and Assessing Accountability
Public Enterprise in the Modern Western World
A Theoretical Framework on the Determinants of Strategic Cities
Policy mimesis in the context of global governance
Relationship between Citizenship and Public Administration
Outcome-orientation in performance contracts
How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience
Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance
A Value-For-Money Pathway
Animals in the administrative zoo
Accountability in Central and Eastern Europe
Agents or Stewards
Why Are Goals Important in the Public Sector? Exploring the Benefits of Goal Clarity for Reducing Turnover Intention
The Iron Cage Revisited
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,13 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2024 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |