Emergency management through enduring collaborative networks
Lessons on phases and levels
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10391624 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Asbjørn Røiseland (0000-0002-4282-9365, Oslo Business School, SAM Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo Norway, corresponding author), Håkon Solbu Trætteberg (0000-0002-7250-5150, Institute for Social Research Oslo Norway) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1728-1744 |
| Publication date | 2024-04-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-3298 • E-ISSN: 1467-9299 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/padm.12998 |
| OpenAlex | W4395083317 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 52 |
This article explores the conditions that underpin networks as enduring collaborative relationships. To identify key features that sustain long‐term collaboration, we use the Norwegian system of emergency management as our empirical case. Norway is characterized by the important role played by volunteers and voluntary organizations as partners to the police in search and rescue operations. In particular, the article focuses on two possible explanations for the endurability of these networks: the broad involvement of volunteers in the different phases and the role of intermediaries. The article concludes that intermediaries can compensate for a lack of broad involvement, which may be particularly relevant for emergency management where many different resources have to be mobilized in a short time span and in a fashion that enables fluid interaction. This finding is a reminder that both phases and levels need to be explored in empirical studies of collaborations
Business · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Political science · Process management · Disaster Management and Resilience · Environmental Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Public Policy and Administration Research
A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters
Theorizing collaboration practice
Rethinking Social Inquiry
Spontaneous volunteer coordination during disasters and emergencies
Implementing collaborative governance
Radical and disruptive answers to downstream problems in collaborative governance
Investigating mechanisms for recruiting and retaining volunteers
Managing Transboundary Crises
Mission Impossible? Planning and Preparing for Crisis1
Preparing for Critical Infrastructure Breakdowns
Managing Crises Collaboratively
Collaborative emergency management and national emergency management network
Implementation through collaborative crisis management and contingency planning
How Dare to Demand This from Volunteers! The Impact of Illegitimate Tasks
Organising for Effective Emergency Management
Stay or Exit
Understanding Multiplexity of Collaborative Emergency Management Networks
Structure and Network Performance
Designing and Implementing Cross‐Sector Collaborations
The Role of Nonprofits in Disaster Response
The Effect of Problem Severity, Managerial and Organizational Capacity, and Agency Structure on Intergovernmental Collaboration
The Design and Implementation of Cross‐Sector Collaborations
Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic Through Metagovernance
Robust emergency management
The Institutional Logics Perspective
What Have We Learned since September 11, 2001? A Network Study of the Boston Marathon Bombings Response
The Network Governance of Crisis Response
Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research
Grass-Root Organisations, Intergovernmental Collaboration, and Emergency Preparedness
Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting
Policy Learning and Failure
Building a Theory of Learning in Collaboratives
A leadership framework for cross-sector collaboration
Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |