Dignity during work-integrated learning
What Does It Mean for Supervisors and Students
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4096469 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Olivia King (0000-0002-7182-2891, Monash University), Corinne Davis (0000-0002-6343-2260, Monash University), Allie Clemans (Monash Education Academy, Monash University, Clayton, Australia), John Coles (0000-0001-5822-1103, Monash University), Paul Crampton (0000-0001-8744-930X, Monash University), Nancy Jacobs (0000-0003-4716-4769, Monash University), Thomas Mckeown (0000-0002-1967-7367, Monash University), Janice Morphet (0000-0001-7056-6526, Monash University), Kate Seear (0000-0002-0886-7069, Monash University), Charlotte Rees (0000-0003-4828-1422, Monash University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 46 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 721-736 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Studies in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0307-5079 • E-ISSN: 1470-174X |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03075079.2019.1650736 |
| OpenAlex | W2967020353 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 64 |
Work-integrated learning (WIL) is increasingly common in higher education, with benefits and risks for students and supervisors’ wellbeing. Central to wellbeing is dignity, often described as the respectful treatment of others. While studies have explored dignity for employees, it is yet to be examined in the WIL context. This qualitative study explores 46 student and 30 supervisors' understandings of WIL dignity. Using purposive sampling, supervisors and students from 6 disciplines participated in 7 groups and 58 individual semi-structured interviews. Participants were asked to describe their understandings of workplace dignity and data were analysed using team-based framework analysis. Four themes were identified: (1) participants' difficulties articulating dignity; (2) concepts used to define dignity; (3) the valence of conceptualisations; and (4) the levels to which dignity were conceptualised. Both students and supervisors need to work together to better understand what dignity is as the crucial first step toward maximising dignity during WIL
Dignity · Higher education · Nonprobability sampling · Pedagogy · Political science · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout · Higher Education and Employability · Law · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Social Constructionism
Dignity at Work
Harassment and Discrimination in Medical Training
Qualitative Interviewing Techniques and Styles
Counting in Qualitative Research
Developing pre-professional identity in undergraduates through work-integrated learning
Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research
Shedding the cobra effect
The Prevalence of Medical Student Mistreatment and Its Association With Burnout
The aftermath of workplace violence among healthcare workers
From the Heart of My Bottom”
Dignity and health
Human dignity within teacher education
Exploring teachers’ value orientations in literature and history secondary classrooms
Exploitation or opportunity? Student perceptions of internships in enhancing employability skills
Dignity at Work
Using Reflexivity to Optimize Teamwork in Qualitative Research
Dignity Violation in Health Care
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies
University lawyers
Reclaiming the Moral in the Dispositions Debate
Unpacking the learning-work nexus
Realising the educational worth of integrating work experiences in higher education
Using Numbers in Qualitative Research
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |