Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Doctoral Problems and Taboos

Silence, Well‐Being and Academic Persistence in Czech Doctoral Education

Bibliographic Data

ID17675886
AuthorsTimothy Lintner (0000-0002-1448-4064, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Arts Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic, corresponding author), Karla Brücknerová (0000-0002-4188-7002, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Arts Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic), Barbora Nekardová (0000-0003-2710-032X, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Arts Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic), Jana Navrátilová (0009-0007-9735-185X, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Arts Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic), Jakub Vlček (0009-0005-4585-5277, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Arts Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic), Kristýna Šejnohová (0009-0004-3011-4583, Institute for Research and Development in Education Charles University Prague Czech Republic), Boglárka Belovecová (Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Arts Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic)
Year2026
Volume80
Issue3
Publication date2026-05-04
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHigher Education Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0951-5224 • E-ISSN: 1468-2273
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hequ.70142
OpenAlexW7160333141
LanguageEN
References cited32

This paper examines how the taboos and problems perceived by doctoral students are associated with their well‐being and their intentions to persist in or leave academia. We distinguish between doctoral problems—stressors associated with doctoral study—and doctoral taboos, understood as issues that remain difficult to voice in relationships with supervisors or peers because their disclosure may evoke shame or threaten these relationships. Drawing on a mixed‐methods design conducted in the Czech Republic, we first developed core perceived doctoral problems and taboos based on a qualitative analysis of 21 in‐depth interviews. Doctoral problems and taboos were subsequently examined in a national survey of 190 doctoral students using machine learning models. Financial difficulties constituted the most prevalent doctoral problem, reported by roughly 75% of students. Partial dependence analyses indicated that several doctoral taboos (e.g., finances, parenthood, supervisor quality) were among the strongest predictors of burnout, depression, anxiety, stress and intentions to drop out or leave academia. The study contributes to debates on well‐being in doctoral education by illuminating which issues within doctoral education become taboo and how such tabooization relates to doctoral well‐being and intentions to remain in academia

Czech · Doctoral dissertation · Doctoral studies · Shame · Supervisor · Taboo · Academic integrity and plagiarism · Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions · Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

  • Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success

    Open Access•Els van Rooij, Marjon Fokkens-Bruinsma et al.•Studies in Continuing Education•2021

  • Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine

    Open Access•Braun, Victoria Clarke•Palliative Medicine•2024

  • Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students

    Open Access•Katia Levecque, Frederik Anseel et al.•Research Policy•2017

  • The PhD Experience

    Open Access•Anna Sverdlik, Nathan C Hall et al.•International Journal of Doctoral…•2018

  • Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package

    Open Access•Max Kühn•Journal of Statistical Software•2008

  • Understanding the burnout experience

    Open Access•Christina Maslach, Michael P Leiter•World Psychiatry•2016

  • Mice

    Open Access•Stef Van Buuren, Karin Groothuis‐Oudshoorn et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2011

  • Performance funding of universities and its impacts on accountability

    Michal Plaček, Juraj Nemec et al.•Public Management Review•2023

  • Competing values at public universities

    Open Access•Jiří Mudrák, Katerina Zabrodska et al.•Higher Education Quarterly•2022

  • Inequalities in Becoming a Scholar

    Open Access•Brooke Dinsmore, J Roksa•Teachers College Record The Voice…•2023

  • Calling it quits

    Open Access•Anaïs Glorieux, Bram Spruyt et al.•Studies in Continuing Education•2025

  • Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis

    Braun, Victoria Clarke•Qualitative Psychology•2022

  • Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained

    Open Access•David L Morgan•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2007

  • The approach and application of analysing inductive and deductive datasets

    Open Access•Helen Pearson, Michelle Myall et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2025

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae