Factors Influencing the Functioning of Data Teams
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23325534 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kim Schildkamp (0000-0001-6154-6857, University of Twente), Cindy L Poortman (0000-0001-8133-5985, University of Twente), Cindy Poortman (University of Twente) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 117 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1-42 |
| Publication date | 2015-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0161-4681 • E-ISSN: 1467-9620 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/016146811511700403 |
| OpenAlex | W272924859 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 61 |
| References cited | 45 |
Background Data-based decision making can lead to increased student achievement; however, schools struggle with the implementation of data-based decision making. Professional development in the use of data is therefore urgently needed. However, professional development is often ineffective in terms of improving the knowledge, skills, and attitude of the receiver. Purpose We need a more fundamental understanding of how we can increase the effectiveness of data-use-related professional development. This study therefore focuses on the factors influencing a professional development intervention for data-based decision making: the data team procedure. Data teams are teams of teachers and school leaders who collaboratively learn how to use data, following a structured approach and guided by a facilitator from the university. Based on an extensive literature review, we developed a data use framework in which the use of data is influenced by data characteristics, school organization characteristics, and user and team characteristics. Research Design We conducted case studies. Data Collection We focused on observing in depth the factors that influence the work of the data teams and interviewing the data team members about these factors. Four data teams of six schools for upper secondary education were followed over a period of 2 years. We observed and analyzed 34 meetings and analyzed 23 interviews, combined with our field notes. Although this pilot study only permits analytical generalization of the findings, the findings provide more in-depth insight into the factors that enable and hinder interventions, focusing on supporting collaborative data use in schools. Findings The results show that several data characteristics (access and availability of high-quality data), school organizational characteristics (a shared goal, leadership, training and support, involvement of relevant stakeholders), and individual and team characteristics (data literacy, pedagogical content knowledge [PCK], organizational knowledge, attitude, and collaboration) influence the use of data in data teams. The results also show that these influencing factors are interrelated. Conclusions Schools need support in all aspects of the use of data (from formulation of a problem definition to taking action based on the data). This study can form a starting point for larger studies into the factors influencing these types of professional development interventions to ensure effective implementation and sustainability.
Data collection · Facilitator · Intervention (counseling) · Interview · Knowledge management · Medical education · Pedagogy · Professional development · Psychological intervention · Qualitative property · Computer Science · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
Escolas em Foco
The role of ICT for school leadership and management activities
Solving student achievement problems with a data use intervention for teachers
Irish teachers, starting on a journey of data use for school self-evaluation
Effects of a data use intervention on educators’ use of knowledge and skills
A model of teacher agency in professional development and school reform
Data-based decision-making for school improvement
Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making
The role of teachers in educational reform
Inquiry-oriented professional teachers in Spain
Do pupils at research-informed schools actually perform better? Findings from a study at English schools
Role of data literacy training for decision-making in teaching practice
Explicating the Value of Standardized Educational Achievement Data and a Protocol for Collaborative Analysis of This Data
Rethinking success
Sustainable evidence-driven school improvement
Beyond the Numbers
How Professional Learning Networks Can Support Teachers’ Data Literacy
Teacher Evaluation as a Data-Use Intervention
Using an Evidence-Informed Approach to Improve Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills
Exploring the Perceptions of Estonian Teachers’ Data Use in School Development
South African Mathematics Teachers’ Perspectives on Data-Driven Instructional Decision-Making
School leadership writ small
Formative assessment
Data Literacy Training for K–12 Teachers
Exploring the factors influencing teachers’ instructional data use with electronic data systems
Teacher leadership in school self-evaluation
Possibilities and Challenges
Comprehensive and Superficial Data Users
Does Teacher Data Use Lead to Improved Student Achievement? A Review of the Empirical Evidence
We Are Left Alone
Characterizing adaptive teaching expertise
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making
From Compliance to Improvement
What do we know about internal school evaluation? A systematic review
Capacity building to bridge data use and instructional improvement through evidence on student thinking
Sustaining data use professional learning communities in schools
Data literacy
Data use for equity
Data-based individualization in mathematics to support middleschool teachers and their students with mathematics learning difficulty
The development of data use, data skills, and positive attitude towards data use in a data team intervention for teacher educators
Misconceptions about data-based decision making in education
On the value of data-based decision making in education
When artificial intelligence meets educational leaders’ data-informed decision-making
The intersection of school context and teachers’ data use practice
Data use for school self-evaluation – The process, factors, and leadership practices in Estonian schools
Bridging perspectives
Lernstandserhebungen
Zwei Studien, ein Ergebnis
Key actors leading knowledge brokerage for sustainable school improvement with PLCs
Data-driven decision making using local multi-source data
Contributing conditions
Affective learning for effective learning? Data, numbers and teachers’ learning
Fostering aspects of pre-service teachers’ data literacy
Professional development in data use
When perceived informativity is not enough. How teachers perceive and interpret statistical results of educational research
The impact of data use professional development on student achievement
The quest for sustained data use
What does it mean for teachers to be data literate
Student-involved data use
The quandary of quantification
Equipping Preservice Teachers for Data Use
A Perfect Time for Data Use
Interventions Promoting Educators’ Use of Data
Case Study Research
Assessment and Classroom Learning
A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews
Attitudes towards school self-evaluation
Those Who Understand
Professional development to promote schoolwide inquiry
Collaborative inquiry to make data-based decisions in schools
Data-informed curriculum reform
The Practice of Data Use
Strategies to Promote Data Use for Instructional Improvement
Tough Choices in Designing a Formative Assessment System
Understanding Data Use Practice among Teachers
Teachers’ Use of Data
School–Central Office Relationships in Evidence Use
Data in Practice
Data Use for School Improvement
A Systemic View of Implementing Data Literacy in Educator Preparation
Teaching and Teacher Education
Attending to Problems of Practice
Improving Impact Studies of Teachers' Professional Development
Situated Learning
| Unique citing works | 61 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 6,1 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 56 |