Doing Design Thinking

Conceptual Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda

Bibliographic Data

ID23352145
AuthorsPietro Micheli (0000-0001-7920-6500, University of Sussex, corresponding author), Sarah J S Wilner (University of Sussex), Sabeen Hussain Bhatti (0000-0002-2599-9856, University of Sussex), Matteo Mura (0000-0002-5762-2228, University of Sussex), Michael B Beverland, Michael Beverland (0000-0002-3142-0441, University of Sussex)
Year2019
Volume36
Issue2
Pages124-148
Publication date2019-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Product Innovation Management (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0737-6782 • E-ISSN: 1540-5885
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jpim.12466
OpenAlexW2885050103
LanguageEN
Citations received66
References cited95

Design thinking has attracted considerable interest from practitioners and academics alike, as it offers a novel approach to innovation and problem‐solving. However, there appear to be substantial differences between promoters and critics about its essential attributes, applicability, and outcomes. To shed light on current knowledge and conceptualizations of design thinking we undertook a multiphase study. First, a systematic review of the design thinking literature enabled us to identify 10 principal attributes and 8 tools and methods. To validate and refine our findings, we then employed a card sorting exercise with professional designers. Finally, we undertook a cluster analysis to reveal structural patterns within the design thinking literature. Our research makes three principal contributions to design and innovation management theory and practice. First, in rigorously deriving 10 attributes and 8 essential tools and methods that support them from a broad and multidisciplinary assortment of articles, we bring much needed clarity and validity to a construct plagued by polysemy and thus threatened by “construct collapse.” Second, aided by the identification of perspectives of scholars writing about design thinking, we provide detailed recommendations for relevant topics warranting further study in order to advance theoretical understanding of design thinking and test its applications. Third, we identify the enduring, yet essential, questions that remain unresolved across the extant design thinking literature and that may impede its practical implementation. We also provide suggestions for the theoretic frames, which may help address them, and thus advance the ability of scholars and managers alike to benefit from design thinking’s apparent advantages.

Card sorting · CLARITY · Construct (python library) · Data science · Design Thinking · Engineering ethics · Identification (biology) · Knowledge management · Management · Management science · Multidisciplinary approach · Polysemy · Principal (computer security) · Social science · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Design Education and Practice · Engineering · Product Development and Customization

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access