Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Condorcet Social Choice Functions

Bibliographic Data

ID23367665
AuthorsPeter C Fishburn (corresponding author)
Year1977
Volume33
Issue3
Pages469-489
Publication date1977-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-1399 • E-ISSN: 1095-712X
PublisherSociety for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1137/0133030
OpenAlexW1968498770
LanguageEN
Citations received73
References cited17

A Condorcet social choice function elects the candidate that beats every other candidate under simple majority when such a candidate exists. Various extensions of Condorcet’s simple majority principle that deal with situations that have no simple majority winner have been proposed.Nine Condorcet social choice functions are analyzed and compared on the basis of how well they satisfy a number of conditions for social choice functions. The conditions include several generalizations of Condorcet’s Principle. Remarks on the relative merits of the nine basic functions are included.

Condorcet method · Epistemology · Mathematical economics · Mathematical optimization · Simple (philosophy) · Social choice theory · Voting · Applied Mathematics · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Mathematics

  • Social Choice and Legitimacy

    Open Access•John W Patty, Elizabeth Maggie Penn•Social Choice and Legitimacy•2014

  • Risk-limiting Audits and the Margin of Victory in Nonplurality Elections

    Anand D Sarwate, Stephen Checkoway et al.•Statistics Politics and Policy•2013

  • Research on Urbanization in the Developing World

    Open Access•Stanislav Shmelev•Journal of Political Ecology•2003

  • A New Solution Set for Tournaments and Majority Voting

    Nicholas R Miller•American Journal of Political…•1980

  • Electoral Equilibrium under Alternative Voting Institutions

    Gary W Cox•American Journal of Political…•1987

  • Covering, Dominance, and Institution-Free Properties of Social Choice

    Richard D Mckelvey•American Journal of Political…•1986

  • La norme majoritaire

    Jean-François Laslier, Jean‐françois Laslier•Revue économique•1999

  • An empirical study of some election systems

    Clyde H Coombs, Jerry L Cohen et al.•American Psychologist•1984

  • Cycles and Social Choice

    Thomas Schwartz•Cycles and Social Choice•2018

  • Applications of Shapley-Owen Values and the Spatial Copeland Winner

    Open Access•Joseph Godfrey, Joseph J Godfrey et al.•Political Analysis•2011

  • The Incidence of Some Voting Paradoxes Under Domain Restrictions

    Open Access•Hannu Nurmi•Group Decision and Negotiation•2020

  • Normed Negative Voting to Depolarize Politics

    Open Access•Karthik H Shankar•Group Decision and Negotiation•2022

  • Characterization of tie-breaking plurality rules

    Open Access•Hiroki Saitoh•Social Choice and Welfare•2022

  • Daunou’s voting rule and the lexicographic assignment of priorities

    Open Access•Salvador Barberà, Walter Bossert et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2021

  • An axiomatic characterization of Split Cycle

    Open Access•Yifeng Ding, Wesley H Holliday et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2025

  • Relaxed notions of Condorcet-consistency and efficiency for strategyproof social decision schemes

    Open Access•Felix Brandt, Patrick Lederer et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2024

  • An analytical and experimental comparison of maximal lottery schemes

    Open Access•Florian Brandl, Felix Brandt et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2022

  • Generalized medians and a political center

    Open Access•Tasos Kalandrakis•Social Choice and Welfare•2022

  • An axiomatic characterization of the Slater rule

    Open Access•Burak Can, Mohsen Pourpouneh et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2021

  • Escaping Arrow’s theorem

    Open Access•Wesley H Holliday, M Kelley•Theory and Decision•2025

  • Why Do Courts Delay

    Open Access•Deborah Beim, Tom S Clark et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2017

  • Federal Directives, Local Discretion and the Majority Rule

    Antoine Loeper•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2013

  • Choosing how we choose

    Open Access•Sebastián Linare, Gustavo A Bodanza•Constitutional Political Economy•2025

  • From ratings to rankings

    Open Access•Yu Xiao, Bohua Wang et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2025

  • Centrality Orderings in Social Networks

    Herman Monsuur, Ton Storcken•Chapters in game theory•2005

  • Heresthetics and choice from tournaments

    Open Access•Scott Moser, Molly Fenn et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2016

  • Axioms for defeat in democratic elections

    Open Access•Wesley H Holliday, Eric Pacuit•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2021

  • The stability set as a social choice correspondence

    Open Access•Martin Mathieu, Mathieu Martin et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2002

  • Choosing from a weighted tournament

    Open Access•Philippe De Donder, Michel Le Breton et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2000

  • The Dodgson ranking and the Borda count

    Open Access•Christian Klamler•Mathematical Social Sciences•2004

  • On the solution of w-stable sets

    Open Access•Weibin Han, Adrian Van Deemen•Mathematical Social Sciences•2016

  • Optimal bounds for the no-show paradox via SAT solving

    Open Access•Felix Brandt, Christian Geist et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2017

  • The solution of generalized stable sets and its refinement

    Open Access•Weibin Han, Adrian Van Deemen•Mathematical Social Sciences•2021

  • Resolute refinements of social choice correspondences

    Open Access•Daniela Bubboloni, Michele Gori•Mathematical Social Sciences•2016

  • Research in decision theory

    Open Access•Peter C Fishburn•Mathematical Social Sciences•1983

  • On the reversal bias of the Minimax social choice correspondence

    Open Access•Daniela Bubboloni, Michele Gori•Mathematical Social Sciences•2016

  • Metric rationalisation of social choice functions according to principles of social choice

    Open Access•Nick Baigent•Mathematical Social Sciences•1987

  • Informational requirements of social choice rules

    Open Access•Shin Sato•Mathematical Social Sciences•2009

  • Revisiting the connection between the no-show paradox and monotonicity

    Open Access•Matías Núñez, M Remzi Sanver•Mathematical Social Sciences•2017

  • A solution for abstract decision problems based on maximum flow value

    Open Access•Michele Gori•Mathematical Social Sciences•2024

  • How hard is it to tell which is a Condorcet committee

    Open Access•Andreas Darmann•Mathematical Social Sciences•2013

  • On two new social choice correspondences

    Open Access•Peter Borm, René Van Den Brink et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2004

  • SSB Utility theory

    Open Access•P C Fishburn•Mathematical Social Sciences•1984

  • King-chicken choice correspondences

    Open Access•Matheus Costa, Gil Riella•Mathematical Social Sciences•2022

  • A survey on the complexity of tournament solutions

    Open Access•Olivier Hudry•Mathematical Social Sciences•2009

  • Condorcet choice correspondences

    Open Access•Gilbert Laffond, Jean‐françois Laslier et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•1995

  • Induced social welfare functions

    Open Access•M F Janowitz•Mathematical Social Sciences•1988

  • Informational requirements of social choice rules to avoid the Condorcet loser

    Open Access•Shin Sato•Mathematical Social Sciences•2016

  • Computing the minimal covering set

    Open Access•Felix Brandt, Felix Fischer•Mathematical Social Sciences•2008

  • Condorcet Consistency and the strong no show paradoxes

    Open Access•Laura Kasper, Hans Peters et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2019

  • The median procedure in cluster analysis and social choice theory

    Open Access•Jean Pierre Barthelemy, Bernard Monjardet•Mathematical Social Sciences•1981

  • A Borda measure for social choice functions

    Open Access•Michel Le Breton, Michel Truchon•Mathematical Social Sciences•1997

  • Elections with partially ordered preferences

    Open Access•Michael Ackerman, Sul-Young Choi et al.•Public Choice•2013

  • A note on Nanson's rule

    Open Access•Emerson M S Niou•Public Choice•1987

  • Running off empty

    Open Access•Jeffrey T Richelson•Public Choice•1980

  • Split Cycle

    Open Access•Wesley H Holliday, Eric Pacuit•Public Choice•2023

  • Two types of participation failure under nine voting methods in variable electorates

    Open Access•Dan S Felsenthal, Hannu Nurmi•Public Choice•2016

  • Monotonicity and its Cognates in the Theory of Choice

    Open Access•Hannu Nurmi•Public Choice•2004

  • Parliamentary procedure

    Open Access•Thomas Schwartz•Public Choice•2008

  • Weak Condorcet winner(s) revisited

    Open Access•Dan S Felsenthal, Nicolaus Tideman•Public Choice•2014

  • A note on ?A note on Nanson's rule

    Open Access•P C Fishburn•Public Choice•1990

  • Some properties of the Lehrer-Wagner method for reaching rational consensus

    Open Access•Hannu Nurmi•Synthese•1985

  • Preference-based choice functions

    Open Access•Sven Ove Hansson, Oskar Hansson•Synthese•2009

  • Social Choice Observed

    John R Chamberlin, Jerry L Cohen et al.•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • Unanimity overruled

    Open Access•Klaus Nehring, Marcus Pivato et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2016

  • Which Decision Rule for the Future Council

    Open Access•Hannu Nurmi, Madeleine O Hosli•European Union Politics•2003

  • Social Choice Theory and Democracy

    Open Access•Hannu Nurmi•European Journal of Political…•1984

  • A Priori Bounds on Legislative Bargaining Agreements

    Open Access•Tasos Kalandrakis•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Probability and Plausibility of Cycles in Three-party Systems

    Open Access•Katri Sieberg, Katri K Sieberg et al.•British Journal of Political…•2011

  • Voting Procedures

    Open Access•Hannu Nurmi•British Journal of Political…•1983

  • Coincidence probabilities for simple majority and positional voting rules

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•Social Science Research•1978

  • Who ought to be elected and who is actually elected? An empirical investigation of 92 elections under three procedures

    Open Access•Dan S Felsenthal, Moshé Machover•Electoral Studies•1995

  • Approval Voting

    Open Access•Steven J Bram, Steven J Brams et al.•American Political Science Review•1978

  • Social Choice Theory

    Amartya Sen•Econometrica•1977

  • Aggregation of Preferences with Variable Electorate

    John H Smith•Econometrica•1973

  • An axiomatization of Borda's rule

    Open Access•H P Young•Journal of Economic Theory•1974

  • Collective Choice and Social Welfare

    Open Access•Amartya Sen•Collective Choice and Social…•2017

  • The Theory of Committees and Elections

    Open Access•Duncan Black, Georg Kunze•Theory of Committees and Elections•1986

  • Social Choice and Individual Values

    I M D Little•Journal of Political Economy•1952

  • Rational Choice Functions and Orderings

    Kenneth J Arrow•Economica•1959

  • Mathematical Derivation of an Election System

    Alfred De Grazia•Isis•1953

  • Paradoxes of Voting

    Open Access•Peter C Fishburn•American Political Science Review•1974

Unique citing works73
Citations per year1,52
Citation span1978 - 2025 (48)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 65

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae