Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

No Compromise

Political Consequences of Moralized Attitudes

Bibliographic Data

ID6230118
AuthorsTimothy J Ryan (0000-0002-8992-6760, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume61
Issue2
Pages409-423
Publication date2017-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ajps.12248
OpenAlexW2182911383
LanguageEN
Citations received101
References cited55

Evolutionary, neuroscientific, and cognitive perspectives in psychology have converged on the idea that some attitudes are moralized—a distinctive characteristic. Moralized attitudes reorient behavior from maximizing gains to adhering to rules. Here, I examine a political consequence of this tendency. In three studies, I measure attitude moralization and examine how it relates to approval of political compromise. I find that moralized attitudes lead citizens to oppose compromises, punish compromising politicians, and forsake material gains. These patterns emerge on economic and noneconomic issues alike and identify a psychological phenomenon that contributes to intractable political disputes

Compromise · Economics · Epistemology · Phenomenon · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Variety (cybernetics · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Religious authority and political solutions to conflict

    Open Access•M Freedman, Pazit Ben-Nun Bloom•Politics and Religion•2026

  • How moral values underpin and affect attitudes on ethnic discrimination

    Open Access•Ida Bruun Nørregaard•Political Psychology•2026

  • Law Breaking and Law Bending

    Open Access•Cassilde Schwartz, Miranda Simon et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Grandstanding

    Justin Tosi, Brandon Warmke•Grandstanding•2020

  • The Rise and Fall of Political Orders

    Richard Ned Lebow•Rise and Fall of Political Orders•2018

  • What's in a Norm? Centering the Study of Moral Values in Scholarship on Norm Interactions

    Open Access•Kathryn Quissell•International Studies Review•2022

  • (Ir)rationality of Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Michel Regenwetter, Brittney Currie et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2025

  • The Stability of Moralized Attitudes Over Time

    Open Access•Andrew Luttrell, Lacount J Togans•Personality and Social Psychology…•2021

  • How Contextual Features Shape Incivility Over Time

    Open Access•Ine Goovaerts, Emma Turkenburg•Communication Research•2023

  • How Moral Reframing Enhances Political Persuasion

    Open Access•Yoo Ji Suh, Hyun Suk Kim•Communication Research•2025

  • How Partisan Media Influences Aversion to Political Compromise

    Open Access•Yoo Ji Suh, Dhavan V Shah et al.•Media and Communication•2025

  • Virtuous people and evil elites? The role of moralizing frames and normative distinctions in identifying populist discourse

    Open Access•Sophia Hunger•Political Research Exchange•2024

  • Bridging the divide

    Open Access•Jonah Koetke, Beverly G Conrique et al.•Journal of Social and Political…•2023

  • The paradoxical thinking ‘sweet spot’

    Open Access•Boaz Hameiri, Orly Idan et al.•Journal of Social and Political…•2020

  • Moral polarization and out-party hostility in the US political context

    Open Access•Ben M Tappin, Ryan Mckay•Journal of Social and Political…•2019

  • Understanding committed leftists in the United States right before the 2020 U.S. presidential election

    Open Access•Grace Flores‐roble, Alix Alto et al.•Journal of Social and Political…•2025

  • Why moral advocacy leads to polarization and proselytization

    Open Access•Ravini S Abeywickrama, Joshua J Rhee et al.•Journal of Social and Political…•2020

  • Losing Common Ground

    Open Access•L Mason•The Forum•2018

  • The Evolution of Morality Policy Debate

    Open Access•Rebecca J Kreitzer, Kellen A Kane et al.•The Forum•2019

  • Moral Conviction and Immigration Attitudes in America

    Open Access•Maura Mcdonald, Timothy J Ryan•The Forum•2019

  • When you’re a star, they let you do it”

    Open Access•Muhammad Ehab Rasul, Audrey Halversen et al.•Communication and the Public•2025

  • Measures of Argument Strength

    Sungbin Youk, Musa Malik et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2023

  • Nationalist Backlash Against Foreign Climate Shaming

    Matias Spektor, Umberto Mignozzetti et al.•Global Environmental Politics•2021

  • The Greek crisis as a “morality tale”? An empirical assessment

    Open Access•Nicola Nones•European Union Politics•2024

  • Says who? The role of party cues in explaining the positive and negative consequences of political moral appeals in western Europe

    Open Access•Linda Bos•Party Politics•2025

  • Attitudes moralization and outgroup dehumanization in the dynamic between pro‐ vs. anti‐vaccines against Covid‐19

    Open Access•Chiara Ballone, Maria Giuseppina Pacilli et al.•Journal of Community & Applied…•2023

  • Conspiracism in Populist Radical Right Candidates

    Open Access•Patrick S Sawyer•International Journal of Politics…•2021

  • Proving Her Strength

    Open Access•Nicole Huffman, Lauren P Olson et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Commanding Support

    Adam Liu, J Ko et al.•International Interactions•2021

  • How Republicans Won on Voter Identification Laws

    Open Access•Pamela Johnston Conover, Patrick Miller et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2018

  • Boundaries and cleavages

    Open Access•Linus Westheuser•European Journal of Cultural and…•2025

  • Compromise between realism and moralism

    Open Access•Patrick Overeem•Critical Review of International…•2023

  • Identity–Policy Fusion and Polarization in United States House Campaign Language

    Open Access•Tenzin Tamang•The International Journal of…•2026

  • Similar Moral Values, Different Agendas? U.S. Politicians’ Use of Moral Language Is Issue-Specific

    Open Access•Enrique Muñoz de Cote, Éloïse Côté et al.•Political Psychology•2025

  • Why do Public Debates Escalate? Trigger Points and the Moral Dynamics of “Hot Politics”

    Open Access•Linus Westheuser, Thomas Lux et al.•British Journal of Sociology•2026

  • Education and Voter Response to Principled Trade-Offs in Muslim Democracies

    Open Access•Nathanael Gratias Sumaktoyo, M Tahir Kilavuz•Political Studies•2023

  • Expanding the scope and content of morality policy research

    Open Access•Raymond Tatalovich, Dane Wendell•Policy Sciences•2018

  • Green and Good? Examining Intended and Unintended Effects of Morally Framed Climate Messages

    Open Access•Cassandra L C Troy, Nicholas Eng et al.•Environmental Communication•2025

  • Impact of moral conviction on social networking

    Open Access•Iori Kasahara, Minoru Karasawa•Asian Journal Of Social Psychology•2025

  • Moral Foundations, Welcomeness and Belonging, and Visitation to Manassas National Battlefield Park

    Cait M Henry, Cait Henry et al.•Leisure Sciences•2025

  • Polarization over the priority of political problems

    Open Access•Benjamin E Lauderdale, Jack Blumenau•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • Moral relevance varies due to inter‐individual and intra‐individual differences across big data technology domains

    Open Access•Rabia I Kodapanakkal, Mark J Brandt et al.•European Journal of Social…•2022

  • Moralske intuisjoner og politiske orienteringer blant norske velgere

    Open Access•Johannes Due Enstad, H Finseraas•Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning•2024

  • Join or die

    Open Access•Alessandro Del Ponte•Forum Italicum A Journal of…•2023

  • Neil A. O’Brian. The Roots of Polarization

    Open Access•Philip Moniz•Public Opinion Quarterly•2025

  • Endorsing both sides, pleasing neither

    Open Access•Joseph J Siev, Aviva Philipp-Muller et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2024

  • Anything that looks like smoking is bad”

    Open Access•Jordan Wylie, Nirupika Sharma et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2022

  • Compromising to save the climate

    Open Access•Friderike Spang•Ethics in Science and Environmental…•2026

  • Mapping the moral domain in a modern town hall

    Open Access•Emily A Haines, E G Haines et al.•New Media & Society•2026

  • Fired Up by Morality

    Open Access•Kristin N Garrett, Kristin Garrett•Political Psychology•2018

  • The Ideological Predictors of Moral Appeals by European Political Elites; An Exploration of the Use of Moral Rhetoric in Multiparty Systems

    Open Access•Linda Bos, Sophie Minihold•Political Psychology•2022

  • Populism and Protest Intensity

    Open Access•Patrick S Sawyer•Cross-Cultural Research•2023

  • Radicals” and “Racists

    Open Access•Kirsten A Eddy•American Behavioral Scientist•2024

  • Anes Scales Often Do Not Measure What You Think They Measure

    Matthew T Pietryka, Randall C Macintosh•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • Do Politicians Appeal to Discrete Emotions? The Effect of Wind Turbine Construction on Elite Discourse

    Tobias Widmann•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Actions versus Consequences in Political Arguments

    Timothy J Ryan•The Journal of Politics•2019

  • Worlds Apart? Public Agenda Fragmentation in Sweden 1987–2021

    Open Access•Per Oleskog Tryggvason, Adam Shehata et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2025

  • The Road to Cynicism

    Open Access•Li Shao, Dongshu Liu•Political Studies•2019

  • Value Disagreement and Partisan Sorting in the American Mass Public

    Open Access•David J Ciuk•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Suppression by Mobilization

    Open Access•Li Shao, Dongshu Liu et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Broadening the study of morality in multiparty settings through a novel dictionary translation and validation methodology

    Open Access•Clara Husson, Nicola Palma•Political Psychology•2025

  • Moralizing the Covid ‐19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Alexander Bor, Frederik Jørgensen et al.•Political Psychology•2023

  • Competing moral minds? Estimating moral disagreement in American politics

    Open Access•Christian D Johnston, David J Ciuk et al.•Political Psychology•2025

  • How Emotional Frames Moralize and Polarize Political Attitudes

    Open Access•Clifford, Scott Clifford•Political Psychology•2019

  • Moral Obstinacy in Political Negotiations

    Open Access•Andrew W Delton, Peter Descioli et al.•Political Psychology•2020

  • Political psychology and the study of LGBTQI+ groups, politics, and policy

    Open Access•Andrew Flores, Dakota Strode et al.•Political Psychology•2025

  • Moral Conviction, Emotion, and the Influence of Episodic versus Thematic Frames

    David J Ciuk, Joshua Rottman•Political Communication•2021

  • Altruism and Spite in Politics

    Open Access•Alessandro Del Ponte, Andrew W Delton et al.•Political Behavior•2021

  • Generalizing Survey Experiments Using Topic Sampling

    Open Access•Clifford, Thomas J Leeper et al.•Political Behavior•2024

  • Public Attitudes Toward Immigration Policy Across the Legal/Illegal Divide

    Open Access•Matthew Wright, Morris Levy et al.•Political Behavior•2016

  • When Do People View Discrimination as Morally Acceptable

    Open Access•Ida Bruun Nørregaard•Political Behavior•2025

  • Moralization and Foreign Policy Attitudes

    Open Access•Sarah Maxey, Kathleen E Powers•Political Behavior•2025

  • Moral Rhetoric, Extreme Positions, and Perceptions of Candidate Sincerity

    Open Access•Clifford, Elizabeth N Simas•Political Behavior•2024

  • Who is Punished? Conditions Affecting Voter Evaluations of Legislators Who Do Not Compromise

    Open Access•Nichole M Bauer, Laurel Harbridge-Yong et al.•Political Behavior•2017

  • Pay Your Debts

    Open Access•Alessandro Del Ponte, Peter Descioli•Political Behavior•2022

  • How Strong Policy Attitudes Activate Support for Aggressive Political Action

    Open Access•Clifford, Lucas Lothamer•Political Behavior•2025

  • Indirect restrictions demobilize supporters of abortion rights

    Open Access•Elizabeth C Connors, Alessandro Del Ponte et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2025

  • Not So Dangerous? Nationalism and Foreign Policy Preference

    Open Access•J Ko•International Studies Quarterly•2022

  • A Bargaining Theory of Conflict with Evolutionary Preferences

    Open Access•Andrew T Little, Thomas Zeitzoff•International Organization•2017

  • Populism, participation, and political equality

    Open Access•Eva Anduiza, Marc Guinjoan et al.•European Political Science Review•2019

  • The ideological profile of the technocratic citizen

    Open Access•Eri Bertsou, Daniele Caramani et al.•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Complementing and correcting representative institutions

    Open Access•Jonathan W Kuyper, Fabio Wolkenstein•European Journal of Political…•2019

  • Sore losers on election night? Examining the temporal emergence of the winner–loser gap

    Open Access•Einar Bäckström, Erik Bäckström•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Moralizing Immigration

    Open Access•Kristina Bakkær Simonsen, B Bonikowski•Comparative Political Studies•2022

  • How Norms Shape the Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics

    Open Access•Eric Groenendyk, Erik O Kimbrough et al.•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • The Economic Consequences of Partisanship in a Polarized Era

    Open Access•Christopher Mcconnell, Yotam Margalit et al.•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Preaching to the Choir

    Open Access•David E Broockman, Timothy J Ryan•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Losing legitimacy

    Open Access•James L Gibson•American Journal of Political…•2024

  • The Mobilizing Effect of Parties' Moral Rhetoric

    Open Access•Jae-Hee Jung, Jae‐hee Jung•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • Principled or Pragmatic? Morality Politics in Direct Democracy

    Open Access•Céline Colombo•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • The Moral Roots of Partisan Division

    Open Access•Kristin N Garrett, Kristin Garrett et al.•British Journal of Political…•2020

  • When Do Political Parties Moralize

    Open Access•Kristina Bakkær Simonsen, Tobias Widmann•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • Identity Sorting and Political Compromise

    Open Access•Nicholas T Davis•American Politics Research•2019

  • Humanitarianism, Egalitarianism, and Public Support for Political Compromise

    Open Access•David C Barker, Christopher J Carman et al.•American Politics Research•2023

  • From Barack Obama to Donald Trump

    Open Access•Jennifer Lin•Journal of Language and Politics•2025

  • Disentangling norms, morality, and principles

    Open Access•Anette Stimmer, Jess Gliserman•European Journal of International…•2022

  • A New Measure of Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Nuno Campos, Celso Federico•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy

    Open Access•Jennifer Mccoy, Tahmina Rahman et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2018

  • Does moral rhetoric fuel or reduce divides between parties and non-copartisan voters

    Open Access•Jae-Hee Jung•Electoral Studies•2023

  • Intellectualism, Anti-Intellectualism, and Epistemic Hubris in Red and Blue America

    Open Access•David C Barker, Ryan Detamble et al.•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Morality

    Open Access•Jonathan Haidt, Selin Kesebir•Handbook of Social Psychology•2010

  • Party Polarization in Congress

    Open Access•Sean M Theriault•Party Polarization in Congress•2008

  • Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making

    Open Access•Daniel M Bartels•Cognition•2008

  • The Process of Moralization

    Open Access•Paul Rozin•Psychological Science•1999

  • The Psychology of Moral Conviction

    Open Access•Linda J Skitka, Linda Skitka•Social and Personality Psychology…•2010

  • Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2007

  • Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Simone Schnall, Jonathan Haidt et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2008

  • Protected Values

    Open Access•Jonathan Baron, Mark Spranca•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1997

  • Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict

    Open Access•Jeremy Ginges, Atran et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2007

  • Mysteries of morality

    Open Access•Peter Descioli, Robert Kurzban•Cognition•2009

  • Thinking the unthinkable

    Open Access•Philip E Tetlock•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2003

  • Universal moral grammar

    Open Access•John Mikhail•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2007

  • Moral psychology is relationship regulation

    Tage Shakti Rai, Tage Shakti et al.•Psychological Review•2011

  • The emotional dog and its rational tail

    Jonathan Haidt•Psychological Review•2001

  • Telling more than we can know

    Richard E Nisbett, Timothy D Wilson•Psychological Review•1977

  • An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Science•2001

  • Understanding and sharing intentions

    Open Access•M Tomasello, Malinda Carpenter et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2005

  • Groups in Mind

    Open Access•John Tooby, Leda Cosmides•Human Morality and Sociality•2010

  • The Psychology of Self‐defense

    David K Sherman, Geoffrey L Cohen•Advances in Experimental Social…•2006

  • A Preface to Democratic Theory, Expanded Edition

    Robert A Dahl•Preface to Democratic Theory•2006

  • Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite

    Robert Kurzban•Why Everyone Is a Hypocrite•2011

  • Changing Minds, If Not Hearts

    James M Glaser, Timothy J Ryan•Changing Minds, If Not Hearts•2013

  • The Race Card

    Open Access•Tali Mendelberg•Race Card•2001

  • Moral, Believing Animals

    Christian Smith•Moral, Believing Animals•2003

  • Social-cognitive development

    Open Access•Judith G Smetana•Developmental Review•1983

  • The psychology of the unthinkable

    Philip E Tetlock, Orie V Kristel et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2000

  • Conviction

    Robert P Abelson•American Psychologist•1988

  • How Words Do the Work of Politics

    Clifford, Scott Clifford et al.•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Reconsidering Moral Issues in Politics

    Timothy J Ryan•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Theoretical and Empirical Implications of Attitude Strength

    Joanne M Miller, Drexel A Peterson et al.•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Experimenting With the Balancing Hypothesis

    Open Access•John G Geer, Amy Carter et al.•Political Psychology•2004

  • Moral Conviction and Political Engagement

    Open Access•Linda J Skitka, Linda Skitka et al.•Political Psychology•2008

  • Taboo Trade‐offs

    Open Access•Alan Page Fiske, Philip E Tetlock•Political Psychology•1997

  • Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research

    Open Access•Adam J Berinsky, Gregory A Huber et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • Public Preferences for Bipartisanship in the Policymaking Process

    Open Access•Laurel Harbridge, N Malhotra et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2014

  • The Jeffords Switch and Public Support for Divided Government

    Open Access•Stephen P Nicholson•British Journal of Political…•2005

  • Reasoning Chains

    Open Access•Paul M Sniderman, Michael G Hagen et al.•British Journal of Political…•1986

  • Moral Conviction

    Linda Skitka, Christopher W Bauman et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2005

  • Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations

    J Graham, Jonathan Haidt et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009

  • Attitude strength

    Jon A Krosnick, David S Boninger et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1993

  • Moral Emotions and Moral Behavior

    June P Tangney, Jeff Stuewig et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2006

  • Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog

    Jonathan Haidt, Silvia H Koller et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1993

  • A solution to the mysteries of morality

    Peter Descioli, Robert Kurzban•Psychological Bulletin•2013

  • Expressive Partisanship

    Open Access•Leonie Huddy, L Mason et al.•American Political Science Review•2015

  • Is There a Culture War? Conflicting Value Structures in American Public Opinion

    Open Access•William G Jacoby•American Political Science Review•2014

Unique citing works101
Citations per year10,1
Citation span2016 - 2026 (11)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 99

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae