A Competitive Test of the M1(i) and M1(im) Bargaining Sets
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6283565 |
|---|---|
| Authors | H Andrew Michener (University of Wisconsin), Melvin M Sakurai (University of Wisconsin), Kenneth Yuen (University of Wisconsin), Thomas J Kasen (University of Wisconsin) |
| Year | 1979 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 102-119 |
| Publication date | 1979-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/002200277902300106 |
| OpenAlex | W1988975935 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 13 |
Two game theoretic solution theories, the M1(i) bargaining set and the M1(im) modified bargaining set, were tested competitively in six three-person games with side-payments. Subjects were 90 males who participated in 30 bargaining groups. Results showed that M1(im) is significantly and consistently superior to M1(i) in predicting the distribution of payoffs in these conflicts (p <.01). Results are discussed in terms of the formal differences between the theories
Bargaining problem · Distribution (mathematics · Economics · Mathematical analysis · Mathematical economics · Microeconomics · Payment · Set (abstract data type · Test (biology · Computer Science · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Finance · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Mathematics
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,07 |
| Citation span | 1980 - 1983 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |