Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Artificial intelligence awareness perception acceptance and utilization as predictors of academic publishing competence among academics in Nigerian universities

Bibliographic Data

ID24021575
AuthorsUsani Joseph Ofem (0000-0001-8906-7954, Funai Electric (Japan), corresponding author), Ntabiosi C N Igu (Funai Electric (Japan)), Patricia Olom (University of Calabar), Catherine Nkiruka Elechi, Emeka Nwinyinya (Funai Electric (Japan)), Asenath Ebaye (University of Cross River State), Veronica Ngozi Odenigbo (Enugu State University of Science and Technology), Getrude Nkechi Okenwa (Enugu State University of Science and Technology), Thelca Amogechukwu Eze (Enugu State University of Science and Technology), James Omaji Ukatu (Funai Electric (Japan)), James Ukatu
Year2026
Volume4
Issue1
Publication date2026-08-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDiscover Global Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2731-9687 • E-ISSN: 2731-9687
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s44282-026-00474-8
OpenAlexW7172389945
LanguageEN
References cited76

The adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education has significantly reshaped research and academic publishing by providing tools that facilitate literature review, data analysis, manuscript preparation, and plagiarism detection. Despite increasing attention on AI in academia, the impact of academic staff’s awareness, perception, acceptance, and utilization of AI on research publishing competence remains insufficiently investigated, especially in Sub-Saharan universities. This study explored these relationships among 1,420 academic staff from five public universities using a predictive correlational research design. Data were gathered through five validated instruments with strong psychometric properties and analyzed via descriptive statistics, one-sample t-tests, and multiple linear regression. The results indicated that staff demonstrated moderately positive awareness and perception of AI, while acceptance and utilization levels were high, reflecting increasing adoption in research activities. Regression analysis identified AI utilization as the most significant predictor of research publishing competence, followed by acceptance and awareness, whereas perception showed a minimal negative effect. These findings imply that while knowledge and positive attitudes toward AI are relevant, active engagement with AI tools is the key determinant of publishing competence. The study underscores the importance of structured training, institutional support, and policy initiatives to promote effective AI integration, enhancing research productivity, publication quality, and academic competitiveness globally.

Competence (human resources) · Descriptive statistics · Higher education · Perception · Publishing · Self-efficacy · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Abhi Bhattacharya, Michael Haenlein et al.•California Management Review•2019

  • ChatGPT and a new academic reality

    Open Access•Brian Lund, Brady D Lund et al.•Journal of the Association for…•2023

  • Machine learning

    Open Access•M I Jordan, T M Mitchell•Science•2015

  • Artificial intelligence in education

    Open Access•Selin Akgun, Christine Greenhow•AI and Ethics•2022

  • Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals

    Open Access•Lillian T Eby, Tammy D Allen et al.•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2008

  • Publish or perish

    Matthew R Mcgrail, Claire M Rickard et al.•Higher Education Research &…•2006

  • What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science

    Open Access•Chris Stokel-Walker, Richard Van Noorden•Nature•2023

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)

    Open Access•Yogesh K Dwivedi, Laurie Hughes et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context

    Open Access•Mostafa Al-Emran, Vitaliy Mezhuyev et al.•Computers & Education•2018

  • Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education

    Open Access•Sheshadri Chatterjee, Kalyan Kumar Bhattacharjee•Education and Information…•2020

  • ChatGPT

    Open Access•Eva A M van Dis, Johan Bollen et al.•Nature•2023

  • Artificial intelligence in higher education

    Open Access•Helen Crompton, Diane Burke•International Journal of…•2023

  • G*Power 3

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  • User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Viswanath Venkatesh, Venkatesh Venkatesh et al.•MIS Quarterly•2003

  • Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology

    Viswanath Venkatesh, Venkatesh Venkatesh et al.•MIS Quarterly•2012

  • Deep learning

    Open Access•Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio et al.•Nature•2015

  • A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model

    Open Access•Vivek Venkatesh, Viswanath Venkatesh et al.•Management Science•2000

  • The content validity index

    Open Access•Denise F Polit, Cheryl Tatano Beck•Research in Nursing & Health•2006

  • ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education

    Open Access•Enkelejda Kasneci, Kathrin Sessler et al.•Learning and Individual Differences•2023

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • Mentorship in the Age of Generative AI

    Open Access•Ngoc Nguyen, Walter Barbieri•Education Sciences•2025

  • Perceptions of effectiveness and ethical use of AI tools in academic writing

    Open Access•A Subaveerapandiyan, Dattatraya Kalbande et al.•Information Development•2025

  • Moderator effects of mobile users' pedagogical role on science learning

    Open Access•Lehong Shi, Theodore J Kopcha•British Journal of Educational…•2022

  • Intrinsic motivation enhances online group creativity via promoting members’ effort, not interaction

    Open Access•Xinru Zhang, Zhongling Pi et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2021

  • Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology

    Open Access•Timothy Teo•Computers & Education•2011

  • Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys

    Don A Dillman, Jolene D Smyth et al.•Internet, Phone, Mail, and…•2014

  • What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe

    Open Access•Marek Kwiek•Studies in Higher Education•2021

  • Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators

    Open Access•Olaf Zawacki-Richter, Victoria I Marín et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

    Open Access•Lee J Cronbach•Psychometrika•1951

  • Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research

    Open Access•Yehuda Baruch, Brooks C Holtom•Human Relations•2008

  • Ethical Challenges Associated with the Use of Artificial Intelligence in University Education

    Open Access•Yuri Reina Marín, Omer Cruz Caro et al.•Journal of Academic Ethics•2025

  • Digital Transformation Education, Opportunities, and Challenges of the Application of ChatGPT to Emerging Economies

    Open Access•David Mhlanga, Jianzhong Xu•Education Research International•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae