Artificial intelligence awareness perception acceptance and utilization as predictors of academic publishing competence among academics in Nigerian universities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24021575 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Usani Joseph Ofem (0000-0001-8906-7954, Funai Electric (Japan), corresponding author), Ntabiosi C N Igu (Funai Electric (Japan)), Patricia Olom (University of Calabar), Catherine Nkiruka Elechi, Emeka Nwinyinya (Funai Electric (Japan)), Asenath Ebaye (University of Cross River State), Veronica Ngozi Odenigbo (Enugu State University of Science and Technology), Getrude Nkechi Okenwa (Enugu State University of Science and Technology), Thelca Amogechukwu Eze (Enugu State University of Science and Technology), James Omaji Ukatu (Funai Electric (Japan)), James Ukatu |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-08-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discover Global Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2731-9687 • E-ISSN: 2731-9687 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s44282-026-00474-8 |
| OpenAlex | W7172389945 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 76 |
The adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education has significantly reshaped research and academic publishing by providing tools that facilitate literature review, data analysis, manuscript preparation, and plagiarism detection. Despite increasing attention on AI in academia, the impact of academic staff’s awareness, perception, acceptance, and utilization of AI on research publishing competence remains insufficiently investigated, especially in Sub-Saharan universities. This study explored these relationships among 1,420 academic staff from five public universities using a predictive correlational research design. Data were gathered through five validated instruments with strong psychometric properties and analyzed via descriptive statistics, one-sample t-tests, and multiple linear regression. The results indicated that staff demonstrated moderately positive awareness and perception of AI, while acceptance and utilization levels were high, reflecting increasing adoption in research activities. Regression analysis identified AI utilization as the most significant predictor of research publishing competence, followed by acceptance and awareness, whereas perception showed a minimal negative effect. These findings imply that while knowledge and positive attitudes toward AI are relevant, active engagement with AI tools is the key determinant of publishing competence. The study underscores the importance of structured training, institutional support, and policy initiatives to promote effective AI integration, enhancing research productivity, publication quality, and academic competitiveness globally.
Competence (human resources) · Descriptive statistics · Higher education · Perception · Publishing · Self-efficacy · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence
ChatGPT and a new academic reality
Machine learning
Artificial intelligence in education
Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals
Publish or perish
What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context
Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education
ChatGPT
Artificial intelligence in higher education
G*Power 3
The theory of planned behavior
User Acceptance of Information Technology
Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology
Deep learning
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
The content validity index
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
Mentorship in the Age of Generative AI
Perceptions of effectiveness and ethical use of AI tools in academic writing
Moderator effects of mobile users' pedagogical role on science learning
Intrinsic motivation enhances online group creativity via promoting members’ effort, not interaction
Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology
Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys
What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe
Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators
Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research
Ethical Challenges Associated with the Use of Artificial Intelligence in University Education
Digital Transformation Education, Opportunities, and Challenges of the Application of ChatGPT to Emerging Economies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |