Behavior as a function of the situation

Bibliographic Data

ID6200230
AuthorsDavid C Funder (0000-0002-7609-706X, corresponding author), Daniel J Ozer (0000-0003-1052-3078)
Year1983
Volume44
Issue1
Pages107-112
Publication date1983-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037//0022-3514.44.1.107
OpenAlexW4238693351
LanguageEN
Citations received79
References cited9

B oston U niversityT he pow er of several w ell-know n and im portant situational factors to affect be-havior is assessed in term s usually reserved for m easuring pow er of disposi-tions. T he linear effects of incentive for counterattitudinal advocacy on attitudechange, of degree of hurry and num ber of onlookers on bystander intervention,and of proxim ity of authority and victim on obedience average slightly lessthan .40. T his m agnitude is quite com parable to that of im portant dispositionaleffects.T he com parative pow er of dispositionsversus situations to provide an account ofbehavior is an issue that has polarized thefield of personality and social psychology forseveral years. T his polarization has persisteddespite existence of a numbe r of studiesthat allow a com parative exam ination ofvariance com ponents and show extrem edispositional and extrem e situationalview to be equally lacking in em pirical sup-port (B ow ers, 1973; S arason, S m ith, & D i-ener, 1975). T hese studies have not had theim pact that they m ight perhaps because ofcertain m ethodological difficulties inherentin variance-com ponents approach (E p-stein, 1977; G olding, 1975; O lw eus, 1977).N or has insight that both situational andpersonal factors can vary w idely in their abil-ity to affect behavior had m uch influenc e to-w ard m oderating controversy (cf. S nyder& Ickes, in press). R ather, it appears thatman y personality and social psychologistsw ould still endorse M ischel's (1968) assertionthat the initial assum ptions of trait-statetheory . . . sim ply have not been supportedadequately (p. 147) and believe that situa-tional factors generally overw helm disposi-tional ones in determ ination of behavior

Cognitive psychology · Function (biology · Behavioral and Psychological Studies · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Cognitive and psychological constructs research · Psycholinguistics and Behavioral Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Socioeconomic and Demographic Analysis

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub