Social science research on trial
Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13351024 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Susan T Fiske (0000-0002-1693-3425, corresponding author), Donald N Bersoff (Drexel University), Eugene Borgida (0000-0003-1446-7149, Twin Cities Orthopedics), Kay Deaux (0000-0002-9759-9341, City University of New York), Madeline E Heilman (0000-0002-9059-0440) |
| Year | 1991 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 1049-1060 |
| Publication date | 1991-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Psychologist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/0003-066x.46.10.1049 |
| OpenAlex | W2078962473 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 78 |
| References cited | 47 |
The American Psychological Association filed an amicus curiae brief supporting the validity of the field of stereotyping and the general methods used by the expert. Such legal application provides further lessons for psychological research on stereotyping. The American Psychological Association (APA) submitted to the Supreme Court amicus curiae brief. The relevant psychological literature was heavily cited in Judge Gesell's original decision, and the testimony about the psychology of stereotyping was cited at all levels of the appeal and review process, including the Supreme Court's decision and the subsequent remand. Social science evidence has played a significant role in race discrimination cases in the Supreme Court since Brown v. Board of Education, but such evidence had not before been used in sex discrimination cases. The psychological literature is strong in showing how per vasive stereotypes are, in demonstrating the myriad conditions that promote them, and in showing how resistant they can be to new information
Sociology · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Legal Issues in Education · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Social Psychology
Satisfaction, Gender, and Communication in Medical Visits
Biases in the Interpretation and Use of Research Results
Empowering or Oppressing? Development and Exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale
Reactions to Vanguards
Intersectionality
Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much…or not enough
Motivated to Penalize
Employment Discrimination in Organizations
The Transformational and Transactional Leadership of Men and Women
Affirmative action
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Psychological evidence in the courtroom
You’re Too Old for That! Ageism and Prescriptive Stereotypes in the Workplace
Reducing the Effects of Gender Stereotypes on Performance Evaluations
Gender Stereotype-Inconsistent Acts Are Seen as More Acceptable Than Stereotype-Consistent Acts, if They Are Clever
Social Cognition
Gender Stereotypes
SPSSI and Racial Research
Die Anatomie des Glashauses
The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights
Individual differences in social categorization
Self-subjugation among women
Gender and the evaluation of leaders
Self-promotion as a risk factor for women
Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality
When power does not corrupt
Achieving relational authenticity in leadership
Who women are, who women should be
Maintaining the rage
Resolving legal questions with psychological data
Women psychologists in academe
Identity politics
Race and Sex Discrimination in the Employment Process
Women and Men in Conflicting Social Roles
How to Foster Male Engagement in Traditionally Female Communal Roles and Occupations
Providing Expert Knowledge in an Adversarial Context
Be an advocate for others, unless you are a man
Counternormative impression management, likeability, and performance ratings
Sexualize one, objectify all? The sexualization spillover effect on female job candidates
Conditions for Establishing a System of Fairness
Objectification Theory
What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn't be, are Allowed to be, and don't Have to Be
The Sexual Harassment of Men
Interaction of Recruiter and Applicant Gender in Resume Evaluation
Body Size Stereotyping and Internalization of the Thin Ideal in Preschool Girls
Children's perception of gender-role-congruent and -incongruent behavior in peers
Ambivalent Sexism and Applicant Evaluations
If She’s a Feminist it Must Not be Discrimination
Sexual Orientation as Gendered to the Everyday Perceiver
Getting the offer
Oh, Ye of Little Faith
Choosing to sever or maintain association induces biased impression formation
Sex stereotyping in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins
Women at Work
Applications of Forensic Sociology and Criminology to Civil Litigation
Empoderamiento o Subyugación de la Mujer? Experiencias de Cosificación Sexual Interpersonal
The Interplay of Heuristic and Systematic Processing of Social Information
Stereotypes and Reality in the Division of Household Labor
The Association of Marriage and MBA Earnings
Stimulus Selection Based on Gender Ratios
Theoretical, Empirical, and Practical Approaches to Intergroup Conflict
Developing the Research Basis for Controlling Bias in Hiring
The Missing Quadrants of Antidiscrimination
How Basic Can You Be? The Evolution of Research on Gender Stereotypes
Sanctioning Resistance to Sexual Objectification
Ambivalence and Stereotypes Cause Sexual Harassment
Issues in Workplace Sexual Harassment Law and Related Social Science Research
On the Courtroom Use and Misuse of Gender Stereotyping Research
Bridging Divides
When information does not deter stereotyping
Market transformation and the opportunity structure for gender inequality
Reactions to Counterstereotypic Behavior
Gender Discrimination at Work
Gender Bias in Academic Recruitment? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in the Nordic Region
The Opportunity Structure for Discrimination
Stereotypes of working women
Hindering Women's Careers in Academia
Sex Discrimination, Personal Denial, and Collateral Damage
Human inference
Men and women of the corporation
A Cognitive -Attributional Analysis of Stereotyping1
Handbook of Social Psychology
Tokenism in performance evaluation
Social Cognition and Social Perception
Sex Effects on Evaluation
Women in management
A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes
Sex and Gender
Silence is not golden
Social science research in law
The "general acceptance" of psychological research on eyewitness testimony
Social science data and the Supreme Court
Eyewitness identification
Inferences about the femininity of competent women and their implications for likability
Shaping the Organizational Context for Black American Inclusion
Cognitive Aspects of Prejudice 1
Big‐Time Careers for the Little Woman
Turning lead into gold
Causal attributions and other achievement-related cognitions
Accountability and complexity of thought
Reactions to male and female success and failure in sex-linked occupations
The solo woman in a professional peer group
Behavioral sciences and the law
Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations
Figural emphasis and person perception
The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences
Category-based and attribute-based reactions to others
When stereotypes hurt
Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information
Sex stereotypes and social judgment
Those who are number two try harder
Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of their sex, achievement, and personal history
A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects
Another look at sex stereotypes and social judgments
The complexity–extremity effect and age-based stereotyping
Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping
Structure of gender stereotypes
Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks
Polarized appraisals of out-group members
Unfair discrimination in the employment interview
Joan McKay versus John McKay
Gender and the evaluation of leaders
Sex Stereotypes
What's Good for the Goose Is Not Good for the Gander
Token Women
| Unique citing works | 78 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,23 |
| Citation span | 1991 - 2024 (34) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 77 |