The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice
Converging evidence from five studies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6207328 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joel Brockner (Columbia University, corresponding author), Larry Heuer (Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights), Phyllis A Siegel (Louisiana State University in Shreveport), Batia M Wiesenfeld (0000-0002-6854-1976, University of Ulster), Batia Wiesenfeld, Christopher Martins (0000-0001-9244-4511), Christopher Martin (0009-0000-7070-4714, Louisiana State University), Steven L Grover (0000-0003-3081-6660, Georgia State University), Steven Grover, Steven A Grover (0000-0002-0239-9671), Thomas F Reed (University of Ulster), Thomas Reed (0000-0003-3950-9886), T B Reed, Svali Bjorgvinsson |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 394-407 |
| Publication date | 1998-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.394 |
| PMID | 9731315 |
| OpenAlex | W2044981831 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 111 |
| References cited | 4 |
It has been posited that high self-esteem persons (high SEs) are more confident than low self-esteem persons (low SEs) of their capability to provide meaningful input in a decision process. If this is so, then high SEs should be more influenced by their perceived level of voice, relative to low SEs. Survey data from 4 field studies showed that voice was more positively related to various dependent variables among high SEs than low SEs. In Study 5, the authors experimentally manipulated voice as well as participants' beliefs about their capability to provide meaningful input. As expected, voice had a greater impact on the reactions of participants who were led to believe that they were more capable of providing meaningful input. Theoretical implications are discussed.
Developmental psychology · Self-esteem · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
The role of standing in the psychology of procedural justice
Appropriateness of decisions as a moderator of the psychology of voice
Why inconsistent leadership is regarded as procedurally unfair
When the rich contribute more in public good dilemmas
Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures
Social Justice
Justice Theory and Research
Silenced by fear
Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy?
Self-Esteem Within the Work and Organizational Context
Construct Clean‐Up in Proactivity Research
When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity
Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice
Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice
The Psychology of Deservingness and Acceptance of Human Rights
Reactions to Perceived Fairness
Toward Understanding the Psychology of Reactions to Perceived Fairness
The Self-Relevant Implications of Distribution Rules
Why bother? Becoming helpless and depressed at work when voice is non-instrumental in an unfair organizational environment
Procedural fairness predicts cooperative behaviour for high‐self‐esteem individuals but not for low‐self‐esteem individuals
The effect of covert narcissism on workplace incivility
Employees’ feeling trusted, self-concept and creativity in collectivistic cultures
Honesty Is Not Always the Best Policy
Voice and Culture
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
Procedural justice and the hedonic principle
On the Subjective Quality of Social Justice
The psychology of voice and performance capabilities in masculine and feminine cultures and contexts
Group Belongingness and Procedural Justice
Uncertainty management
Referent Cognitions Theory
Better than better-than-average (or not)
Effects of parenting style on personal and social variables for Asian Adolescents
Avoiding piecemeal research on participation in cervical cancer screening
Experimental Research on Just-World Theory
Procedural justice and status
The effects of direct voting and deliberation on legitimacy beliefs
Real Personal Uncertainty Induced by Means of Task-Related Feedback
The Influence of Self-Threats on Fairness Judgments and Affective Measures
How Self-Relevant is Fair Treatment? Social Self-Esteem Moderates Interactional Justice Effects
Non-Contingent Success Reduces People's Desire for Processes that Adhere to Principles of Fairness
Procedural Justice and Affect Intensity
Self-Focus and Procedural Fairness
My Life for A Voice
Perceived leader behavioral integrity and employee voice in SMEs travel agents
Managing cooperation via procedural fairness
Identity Orientation, Voice, and Judgments of Procedural Justice During Late Adolescence
The Coevolution of Perceptions of Procedural Fairness and Link Formation in Self-Organizing Policy Networks
Procedural justice as autonomy regulation
Self-construal level and voice procedures
The multi-value basis of procedural justice
Procedural justice and intragroup status
Justice and the human alarm system
Delineating a method to study cross-cultural differences with experimental control
What Are We Talking about When We Talk about No-Voice Procedures? On the Psychology of the Fair Outcome Effect
Being uncertain about what? Procedural fairness effects as a function of general uncertainty and belongingness uncertainty
The egocentric nature of procedural justice
Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice
Paternalistic leadership and employee voice
When do leaders grant voice? How leaders’ perceptions of followers’ control and belongingness needs affect the enactment of fair procedures
Abusive supervision and deviance behaviors in the hospitality industry
When procedural fairness does not influence how positive I feel
When autocratic leaders become an option—Uncertainty and self-esteem predict implicit leadership preferences
| Unique citing works | 63 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,11 |
| Citation span | 1999 - 2024 (26) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | Yes |
| Citation types | Neutral: 106 |