Making and Keeping Peace
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6271211 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Suzanne Werner (0000-0002-1714-4698, Emory University), Amy T Yuen (0000-0003-2603-7461, Emory University), Amy Yuen |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 02 |
| Publication date | 2005-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8183 • E-ISSN: 1531-5088 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020818305050095 |
| OpenAlex | W2112756924 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 120 |
| References cited | 24 |
Recent efforts to explain why some peace agreements last while others fail have focused on the strength of the agreement itself. Maintaining peace, even if both belligerents want peace, can be difficult if there are temptations to defect or there are reasons to fear that one may be played for the sucker. Strong agreements that can increase the costs of defection, enhance monitoring, or reward cooperation help to solve this enforcement dilemma and generally increase the former belligerents' incentives to remain at peace. Although we agree that such carrots and sticks can facilitate cooperation, we argue in this article that such measures will often be inadequate if the belligerents themselves are no longer committed to keeping the peace. If the belligerents believe that a renewed war can lead to better terms, peace will be precarious. We demonstrate that getting (and keeping) the terms right may be more important than any carrots and sticks incorporated into the document to enforce those terms. In particular, we show that "unnatural" ceasefires that come about as a consequence of third-party pressure are significantly more likely to fail. We also show that ceasefires negotiated after wars with consistent battle outcomes are more likely to last than those where the "right" terms of settlement are less apparent.We would like to thank Virginia Page Fortna, Dani Reiter, Nicholas Sambanis, and the anonymous reviewers and editors of International Organization for their many suggestions and insightful comments on previous versions of this article
Battle · Business · Dilemma · Economics · Enforcement · Incentive · Law and economics · Market economy · Payment · Political economy · Political science · Settlement (finance · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · History · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Political Conflict and Governance
The Production of Knowledge
Incredible Commitments
Exploratory Research
Enduring Rivalries in the Asia-Pacific
Blueprints and Blind Spots
Conventional Arms Control Agreements in Europe
Major powers’ management of complex peace relationships
Compliance with negotiated military dispute settlement
A New Local Turn for Track One Peace Process Research
Consociation, Conditionality, and Commitment
International Multiparty Mediation and Conflict Management
Power in Peacekeeping
Partial Peace
Pain, pressure and political cover
Negotiating Peace with Your Enemy
Sticks and carrots for peace
Clarifying the mediation dilemma
Choosing anarchy
Learning to Live with Militias
Explaining post-independence conflict
Healing Stalemates
Do UN Interventions Cause Peace? Using Matching to Improve Causal Inference
Navigating Uncertainty
Perceptions of Peacebuilding
Territorial acquisition, commitment, and recurrent war
Reducing and Managing Risk
Ceasefire Violations
Managing ethno-national conflict
Towards deliberative peace
Major-power intervention and war initiation by the weak
Violence and Order
The viability of civil war peace agreements
Ceasefire Rationales
Post Conflict Justice, Peacekeeping, and Civil Conflict Recurrence
Deciding on the Tit for the Tat
Once and Future Peacemakers
Ceasefire Success
Conventional arms control and military balance in Europe
U.S. Domestic Vulnerability and the Supply of Third-Party Mediation
Towards a typology of ceasefires
The die is cast? The origins of territorial claims & their escalation to military hostilities
The bargaining framework and Russia's invasion of Ukraine
Settling Civil Wars
Crisis managers but not conflict resolvers
Conflict and the Duration of Peace in Enduring Internal Rivalries
From Words to Deeds
Territorial Issues and Recurrent Conflict
Bargaining power and the arbitration and adjudication of territorial claims
Forecasting conflict management in militarized interstate disputes
The UN at the peacemaking–peacebuilding nexus
Third-party pressure for peace
Civil War Victory and the Onset of Genocide and Politicide
Democratizing the dispute
Helping without hurting
Rebel recruitment and retention in civil conflict
Relative Rebel Strength and Power Sharing in Intrastate Conflicts
State intervention, external spoilers, and the durability of peace agreements
Speaking with one voice
Terminated or Just Interrupted? How the End of a Rivalry Plants the Seeds for Future Conflict
Private goods for peace
Leader similarity and international conflict
Negotiating peacekeeping consent
How Peace Treaties Can Influence Countries’ Climate Policies
Local Ceasefires and De-escalation
Pressed to Prolong
The Curse of Coercive Mediation
Diverse interests facilitate conflict mediation in international crises
A latent variable approach to measuring and explaining peace agreement strength
Clearing the Hurdle
The Problem of Shared Victory
Every Story Has a Beginning, Middle, and an End (But Not Always in That Order)
Quantifying Change Over Time
More dangerous than dyads
Proliferation, preemption, and intervention in the nuclearization of second-tier states
Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes
Bargaining and the Interdependent Stages of Civil War Resolution
Painful Words
Information, Commitment, and War
Muddying the Waters
Oil Wealth, Winning Coalitions, and Duration of Civil Wars
External Subsidies and Lasting Peace
Cheap Signals with Costly Consequences
Civil War Settlements, Perceived Agreement Fairness, and Trust in Political Authorities
Expecting Elections
Third-Party Conflict Management and the Willingness to Make Concessions
Peacekeeping, Mediation, and the Conclusion of Local Ceasefires in Non-State Conflicts
Ceasefires in Civil Conflict
It Takes Two
Slow to Learn
Mediation, Peacekeeping, and the Severity of Civil War
The Importance of UN Security Council Resolutions in Peacekeeping Operations
Peace and War With Endogenous State Capacity
Less Is More? Shifting Power and Third-Party Military Assistance
Settling It on the Field
International Organizations Count
The Logic of Ceasefires in Civil War
Government-Sponsored Mass Killing and Civil War Reoccurrence
Information, Commitment, and Intra-War Bargaining
The Influence of International Organizations on Militarized Dispute Initiation and Duration1
The Effect of Changing Conditions and Agreement Provisions on Conflict and Renegotiation Between States with Competing Claims
Negotiating Peace
Mediation and Peacekeeping in a Random Walk Model of Civil and Interstate War
The security dilemma and ethnic conflict
Stabilizing the Peace After Civil War
Bargaining and the Nature of War
International Crises, 1945-1975
Scraps of Paper? Agreements and the Durability of Peace
Rationalist explanations for war
The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement
Bargainingtheory Andinternationalconflict
A Bargaining Model of War and Peace
Bargaining and Fighting
Testing Nonnested Models of International Relations
Bargaining and Learning While Fighting
Bargaining and War
The Precarious Nature of Peace
Institutionalizing Peace
Indivisible Territory, Geographic Concentration, and Ethnic War
Give War a Chance
The Principle of Convergence in Wartime Negotiations
Information, Power, and War
| Unique citing works | 120 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 6 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2026 (21) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | Yes |
| Citation types | Neutral: 120 |